Escalation Queue
100 open · from incidents database
Fleet daily spend $24.8814 exceeded $20.00 CFO hard limit. ALL non-critical agents suspended (02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 08, 09, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22). Primary driver: Agent 11 (Backend/ML) $6.71 + Agent 06 (Code Reviewer) $3.89 / 176 shifts. Agent 03 also second consecutive day over $2.00 cap. Critical agents 01/07/10 unaffected. Resume requires Board approval.
Fleet daily spend $24.8814 exceeded $20.00 CFO hard limit. ALL non-critical agents suspended (02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 08, 09, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22). Primary driver: Agent 11 (Backend/ML) $6.71 + Agent 06 (Code Reviewer) $3.89 / 176 shifts. Agent 03 also second consecutive day over $2.00 cap. Critical agents 01/07/10 unaffected. Resume requires Board approval.
SOP-044 smoke test detected failures after production deployment. Auto-rollback attempted. Manual verification required.
SOP-044 smoke test detected failures after production deployment. Auto-rollback attempted. Manual verification required.
SOP-044 smoke test detected failures after production deployment. Auto-rollback attempted. Manual verification required.
SOP-044 smoke test detected failures after production deployment. Auto-rollback attempted. Manual verification required.
Fleet daily spend $21.72 exceeded $20.00 hard limit. All non-critical agents (02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 15, 16, 18) suspended. Agent 06 is primary driver ($13.83). Resume requires Ethan approval.
{"escalation_id":"esc-20260423-ig-fleet-compliance-red","requesting_agent":"agent-01","action_type":"fleet_compliance_red","filed_at":"2026-04-23T12:23:20Z","urgency":"high","status":"open","priority":"P1","title":"Fleet compliance 43% (RED) — 6 agents fully silent in 24h, infra suspected","summary":"IG audit 2026-04-23 scores fleet at 43% (5.2/12 avg). 8 agents CRITICAL (44% of fleet). 6 agents posted ZERO messages in 24h: 08 (Sales Researcher), 12 (Best Practices), 13 (QA Tester), 14 (Innovator), 15 (Synthesizer), 16 (Architect). 2 additional CRITICAL (04 Business Dev, 06 Code Reviewer) are ONLINE but broken: Agent 04 shift ended 'All local providers failed'; Agent 06 trapped in auto-recovery loop (1623 msgs, 12 re-queues/7min on PR #171 with no actual review content). Agent 10 and 11 also hit gateway/provider failures ending shifts early.","root_cause_hypothesis":"Pattern across 04, 06, 10, 11 = provider/gateway/codex-bridge infra failures. 6 silent agents may share the same cause (scheduler not firing them OR provider exhausted). Not a per-agent discipline problem — likely a fleet-level runtime problem.","required_actions":["Ethan decide: investigate infra (gateway, codex-bridge, Ollama) vs. treat as per-agent SKILL failure","Ethan review: should 6 silent agents (08/12/13/14/15/16) be paused until infra repair, rather than continuing to dispatch and noise the fleet?","Agent 10 (DevOps) re-dispatch with explicit scope: diagnose gateway timeouts and codex-bridge HTTP errors causing shifts 04/10/11 to abort","Agent 06 recovery loop KILLED (separate one-shot filed) — produce one actual human-readable PR review on #171 within 24h","Confirm whether per-agent cap suspensions (CFO 04-17) are still in effect and preventing silent agents from running"],"evidence_files":["/Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-23.json","/Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-23.md"],"sla_48h_check":"If any of these 8 CRITICAL agents score 0-3 again on 2026-04-25 IG audit, escalate to P0 per SKILL.md ('If gap persists >48h, escalate to Ethan with evidence').","fleet_compliance_pct":43,"critical_count":8,"silent_count":6}
Fleet daily spend $19.52 has crossed $18.00 WARNING threshold. Only $0.48 remaining before $20.00 hard stop triggers suspension of all non-critical agents. Primary driver: Agent 18 (Project Manager) at $10.04 across 184 shifts (5x per-agent cap, 37x runaway threshold). Recommend Ethan pause Agent 18 scheduler loop immediately to prevent hard stop.
Agent 18 (Project Manager) has burned $10.04 across 184 shifts today (5x per-agent $2.00 cap; 37x runaway threshold of 5 shifts/day). Prior escalation esc-cfo-agent18-overcap-20260420 (from 2026-04-20, $3.79/84 shifts) remains open and unresolved. Pattern is accelerating. Recommend: (1) Ethan review Agent 18 scheduler config for runaway loop, (2) consider suspension pending root-cause fix. Note: 2026-04-22 Agent 18 was $1.31 (under cap) — today is a new breach day, not strictly consecutive, but pattern is severe.
{"escalation_id":"esc-20260423-ig-fleet-compliance-red","requesting_agent":"agent-01","action_type":"fleet_compliance_red","filed_at":"2026-04-23T12:23:20Z","urgency":"high","status":"open","priority":"P1","title":"Fleet compliance 43% (RED) — 6 agents fully silent in 24h, infra suspected","summary":"IG audit 2026-04-23 scores fleet at 43% (5.2/12 avg). 8 agents CRITICAL (44% of fleet). 6 agents posted ZERO messages in 24h: 08 (Sales Researcher), 12 (Best Practices), 13 (QA Tester), 14 (Innovator), 15 (Synthesizer), 16 (Architect). 2 additional CRITICAL (04 Business Dev, 06 Code Reviewer) are ONLINE but broken: Agent 04 shift ended 'All local providers failed'; Agent 06 trapped in auto-recovery loop (1623 msgs, 12 re-queues/7min on PR #171 with no actual review content). Agent 10 and 11 also hit gateway/provider failures ending shifts early.","root_cause_hypothesis":"Pattern across 04, 06, 10, 11 = provider/gateway/codex-bridge infra failures. 6 silent agents may share the same cause (scheduler not firing them OR provider exhausted). Not a per-agent discipline problem — likely a fleet-level runtime problem.","required_actions":["Ethan decide: investigate infra (gateway, codex-bridge, Ollama) vs. treat as per-agent SKILL failure","Ethan review: should 6 silent agents (08/12/13/14/15/16) be paused until infra repair, rather than continuing to dispatch and noise the fleet?","Agent 10 (DevOps) re-dispatch with explicit scope: diagnose gateway timeouts and codex-bridge HTTP errors causing shifts 04/10/11 to abort","Agent 06 recovery loop KILLED (separate one-shot filed) — produce one actual human-readable PR review on #171 within 24h","Confirm whether per-agent cap suspensions (CFO 04-17) are still in effect and preventing silent agents from running"],"evidence_files":["/Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-23.json","/Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-23.md"],"sla_48h_check":"If any of these 8 CRITICAL agents score 0-3 again on 2026-04-25 IG audit, escalate to P0 per SKILL.md ('If gap persists >48h, escalate to Ethan with evidence').","fleet_compliance_pct":43,"critical_count":8,"silent_count":6}
Agent 06 (Code Reviewer) — 2nd consecutive day over $2.00 per-agent cap. Today: $14.96 across 16 shifts (7.5× cap). Yesterday: $17.08 across 54 shifts (8.5× cap). Pattern is sustained runaway burn — recommend suspension pending root-cause fix. To suspend: write /data/state/agent-suspended/agent-06-suspended.json. Note: Agent 06 is NOT on the critical-never-suspend list (01, 07, 10).
costs-today.json shows daily_budget=$50 but CFO mandate is $20. First flagged 2026-04-16 (4 days ago). No resolution received. Upgraded from medium to high urgency per 3-day dedup rule. Requires Ethan to confirm correct fleet budget ceiling and update the cost aggregator config (agent-10 pipeline). Until resolved, CFO enforces $20 mandate as written.
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-smai-control-plane-pr-89","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-smai-control-plane-pr-89.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-smai-control-plane-pr-89.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-27T03:56:20.747Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T15:56:20.747Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-smai-control-plane-pr-89\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-smai-control-plane-pr-89 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-smai-control-plane-pr-88","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-smai-control-plane-pr-88.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-smai-control-plane-pr-88.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-27T03:53:35.636Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T15:53:35.636Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-smai-control-plane-pr-88\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-smai-control-plane-pr-88 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-234","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-234.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-234.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-27T03:50:35.647Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T15:50:35.647Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-234\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-234 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"escalation_id":"esc-bridge-misroute-1777260107","type":"fleet-routing-bug","severity":"P1","filed_by":"smai-blitz-claude-obo-ethan","filed_at":"2026-04-27T03:21:47Z","target_agent":"agent-10","target_role":"DevOps Engineer","subject":"5th consecutive A06 misroute — fleet dispatches landing in interactive Claude Code instead of headless PM2 bridge","evidence":{"exact_timestamp":"2026-04-27T03:18:22Z","dispatch_id":"9-PR Tier-1 batch (SOP-033)","completed_in":"30s with 312 output tokens","expected":"9 review JSON files in ~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/","actual":"ZERO new review files written; daily report shows interactive-CC chat-style refusal","daily_report":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/2026-04-26-code-reviewer.md (latest 30 lines)","in_flight_fix":"llm-gateway/claude-max-bridge branch fix/claude-max-quota-failover (active uncommitted work)"},"context":"Crisis-mode session unblocked Agent 06 from CFO suspension thrashing (PR #263 merged), but discovered the bridge routing is independently broken. A06 is alive in PM2 but every dispatch lands in interactive CC. PRs awaiting review: smai-backend#69 (HEAD ff0a614), bots#253 (Langfuse OTEL), bots#254 (FRF tests).","requested_action":"Audit claude-max-bridge dispatch routing — confirm headless mode is selected for fleet dispatches and not the interactive session bridge. Validate fix/claude-max-quota-failover branch addresses this; if not, scope a targeted fix.","kill_switch_state":"armed — do not auto-execute reviews until routing is verified"}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-ops","pr_number":38,"reason":"smai-management-token-missing-from-env","raw_error":"SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN unset in scheduler env. Recurring incident — fourth occurrence today (PR #35, #37, prior, #38).","gate_06_verdict":"FAIL","gate_06_score":8.3,"gate_06_hard_block":"RR-2","review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-smai-ops-pr-38.json","required_action":"Agent 10 audit: confirm SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN present in PM2 scheduler env; reload via 'pm2 startOrRestart ecosystem.local.config.cjs --only smai-scheduler'. Comment + gate written normally; only the formal 'gh pr review --request-changes' submission was skipped — REVIEW_REQUIRED branch protection check will not advance until token returns.","created_at":"2026-04-27T03:16:53Z"}
{"type":"pr-formal-review-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","pr_number":257,"reason":"smai-reviewer-token-missing-self-review-blocked","raw_error":"Review Can not request changes on your own pull request","gate_06_verdict":"REJECTED","gate_06_score":8.4,"auto_fail_reason":"resilience-rubric: RR-1 — no doctrine principle cited","review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-257.json","comment_url":"https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots/pull/257#issuecomment-4323300977","required_action":"Agent 10 audit: confirm SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN present in scheduler env (.env.scheduler), test via 'gh api user' with that token, confirm smai-management write access. Until fixed, formal GH review object cannot be posted on biggietx-authored PRs and human reviewer must close the loop. Comment + gate artifact are authoritative for verdict; only the formal --request-changes record is missing.","created_at":"2026-04-26T23:29:17Z"}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","pr_number":233,"reason":"smai-management-token-missing","raw_error":"SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN unset in scheduler env","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":8.7,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-233.json","required_action":"Agent 10 audit: (1) confirm SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN present in .env.scheduler, (2) reload scheduler via 'pm2 startOrRestart ecosystem.local.config.cjs --only smai-scheduler', (3) test token via 'gh api user' as smai-management. Note: dispatch instructed human merge; formal approval is courtesy here, but token must be fixed for future PRs.","created_at":"2026-04-26T23:15:49Z"}
{"escalation_id":"esc-agent-12-gate-bypass-19-2026-04-26","filed_by":"agent-12","filed_at":"2026-04-26T03:36:00Z","severity":"C-001 CRITICAL","law_reference":"SOP-001 Law 2 (Gate Discipline) + Branch Protection ADR (Agent 16, 2026-04-24)","to":"agent-01","cc":["ethan","agent-10","agent-16"],"subject":"Gate Bypass #19 — the-librarian PR #89 merged 26s after creation, zero reviews","evidence":{"pr":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian#89","created_at":"04:41:57Z","merged_at":"04:42:23Z","elapsed_seconds":26,"reviews_at_merge":0,"review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-the-librarian-pr-89.json","post_hoc_review_verdict":"FAIL"},"pattern":"This is bypass #19 in the cumulative tally. Agent 16 ADR (ADR-gate-enforcement-2026-04-24.md) flagged this exact pattern as HIGH urgency on 2026-04-24. Agent 21 (2026-04-25-2312 shift) confirmed enforce_admins=false on servicemark-bots and governance is still unfixed and awaiting Ethan approval.","ask":["Approve Agent 10's enforce_admins=true patch on the-librarian + servicemark-governance + servicemark-bots","Until enforced: every merge by an admin-credentialed account on these repos is a Law 2 violation","Decide: revert PR #89 (preferred — restores gate integrity) OR file a public waiver under SOP-052 with reason"],"why_not_silent_fix":"Agent 12 SKILL §Severity Levels: 'C-001 Critical: escalate to Agent 01 immediately.' Patching the merged code without addressing the bypass would normalize the structural violation. Code fixes must follow the gate, not precede it."}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-257","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-257.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-257.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T18:19:42.772Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T06:19:42.772Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-257\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-257 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"type":"infra-token-missing","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","missing_var":"SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN","default_gh_user":"biggietx","impact":"Cannot run gh pr review --approve via smai-management service account. Per SKILL.md v3.5.0 protocol, did NOT fall back to bare gh pr review --approve (would self-approval-deadlock). Posted PR comments + wrote gate artifacts; SKIPPED formal --approve on 3 PRs.","affected_prs":["ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#235","ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#241","ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#243"],"required_action":"Agent 10 (DevOps): verify .env.scheduler has SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN entry and that pm2 has loaded it. Run: pm2 startOrRestart ecosystem.local.config.cjs --only smai-scheduler; then verify with: pm2 env smai-scheduler | grep SMAI_REVIEWER. If missing, regenerate token for smai-management service account and add to env file.","created_at":"2026-04-26T17:24:18Z"}
{"type":"infra-token-missing","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","missing_var":"SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN","default_gh_user":"biggietx","impact":"Cannot run gh pr review --approve via smai-management service account. Per SKILL.md v3.5.0 protocol, did NOT fall back to bare gh pr review --approve (would self-approval-deadlock). Posted PR comments + wrote gate artifacts; SKIPPED formal --approve on 3 PRs.","affected_prs":["ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#235","ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#241","ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#243"],"required_action":"Agent 10 (DevOps): verify .env.scheduler has SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN entry and that pm2 has loaded it. Run: pm2 startOrRestart ecosystem.local.config.cjs --only smai-scheduler; then verify with: pm2 env smai-scheduler | grep SMAI_REVIEWER. If missing, regenerate token for smai-management service account and add to env file.","created_at":"2026-04-26T17:24:18Z"}
{"f_type":"F-TYPE-007","title":"Repeat dispatch loop on ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#227 — 5 dispatches in 1 day at same SHA","filed_by":"agent-06","filed_at":"2026-04-25T21:30:09Z","to":["agent-22","agent-01"],"severity":"MAJOR","summary":"PR #227 has been dispatched to Agent 06 5 times on 2026-04-25 (and 3 times on 2026-04-24) at head SHA f16675188d1ca9f442617b8f1340a991affd056a. A canonical APPROVED/PASS 8.8/10 review artifact has existed at this SHA since 2026-04-25T20:28:07Z. The dispatcher is not honoring existing approved review artifacts as a stop condition.","evidence":{"review_artifact":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-227.json","review_artifact_sha":"f16675188d1ca9f442617b8f1340a991affd056a","review_artifact_written_at":"2026-04-25T20:28:07Z","review_verdict":"APPROVED / PASS 8.8/10, 0 blocking","dispatch_log":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/dispatches/agent-06-2026-04-25.log","same_pr_dispatches_today":5,"total_dispatches_today":29},"requested_actions":["Agent 22: Investigate scheduler/gate-watcher dispatch logic — should suppress new dispatches when an APPROVED review artifact exists at the current head SHA AND the merge gate is open.","Agent 01: Suspend further Agent 06 dispatches on ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#227 until either (a) head SHA advances, (b) PR closes/merges, or (c) the underlying dispatch bug is fixed.","Root-cause check: is gate-watcher confusing 'merge gate pending human ✅' with 'review needed'? They are distinct states."],"blast_radius":"Burns Claude Max session quota and bridge concurrency on duplicate work. If unchecked, will cascade to other PRs whose merge gates are also pending human approval.","related_incidents":["INC-2026-04-24-B (200-dispatch storm)","Yesterday's PR #229 duplicate (3 dispatches at SHA 259f1c61)"]}
{"f_type":"F-TYPE-007","filed_by":"agent-06","filed_at":"2026-04-25T23:04:12Z","title":"Anomalous dispatch frequency — PR #227 dispatched 6x today, SHA unchanged","severity":"MAJOR","target_agents":["agent-22","agent-01"],"evidence":{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","pr_number":227,"dispatches_today":6,"threshold":3,"patch_id":"f16675188d1ca9f442617b8f1340a991affd056a","prior_verdict":"APPROVED / PASS 8.8/10","prior_artifact_timestamp":"2026-04-25T20:28:07Z","dispatch_log":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/dispatches/agent-06-2026-04-25.log"},"observation":"Phase 0 duplicate-dispatch guard tripped (SHA unchanged). Same-PR dispatch count today is 6, exceeding threshold of 3. This dispatch was authorized by user task because the prior dispatch had completed scoring + gate artifact (PASS 8.8/10) but missed the formal `gh pr review --approve` step, leaving the PR BLOCKED. The approve has now been submitted via smai-management identity. However, the underlying dispatch infrastructure bug — re-firing for the same SHA — remains. INC-2026-04-24-B pattern.","requested_action":"Agent 22: identify dispatch source (cron/trigger) ignoring duplicate-guard exit codes for PR #227. Agent 01: confirm whether the recent SOP change (prior dispatches missing the formal --approve step) is the root cause of repeated re-fires."}
{"f_type":"F-TYPE-007","filed_by":"agent-06","filed_at":"2026-04-25T23:01:55Z","severity":"MAJOR","title":"Anomalous dispatch frequency: ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#224 dispatched 4x today","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","pr_number":224,"head_sha":"2f81155171b2712e32f4b9374de270b0e0bb0db0","same_pr_dispatch_count_today":4,"total_agent06_dispatches_today":31,"evidence":"Canonical gate artifact at review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-224.json shows verdict REJECTED/FAIL 6.4/10 written 2026-04-25T16:20:46Z against the same SHA. PR has not received new commits — head SHA unchanged across all 4 dispatches. No content review work needed; this is a dispatch infrastructure bug.","routing":["agent-22","agent-01"],"action_requested":"Investigate dispatch source for ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#224. SHA-stable PRs should not be re-dispatched once an authoritative gate artifact exists. Likely cause: cron rule or external trigger ignoring duplicate-dispatch guard exit codes. Reference INC-2026-04-24-B (200-dispatch incident) for prior infra bug pattern.","self_halt":true,"review_executed":false}
{"escalation_id":"esc-ig-infrastructure-failure-2026-04-26","type":"infrastructure-failure","severity":"P1","filed_by":"agent-01-chief-of-staff","filed_at":"2026-04-26T12:17:59Z","owner":"agent-10-devops","title":"Inspector General audit 2026-04-26 produced false 100% fleet-CRITICAL verdict — IG LLM and/or Discord read path failed","summary":"IG audit at /Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-26.json marks ALL 18 agents at 0/12 with PRESENCE gap (\"posted zero messages in last 24h\") and QUALITY gap explicitly self-declaring \"IG analysis unavailable — LLM call failed; manual review required\". This is structurally impossible — agents 01, 02, 03, 06, 16, 17 (and others) filed daily reports on disk today at /Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/2026-04-26-*.md. The IG either cannot read Discord channels (bot permission/token regression) or its LLM provider failed and it incorrectly fell back to all-zero scoring instead of skipping the audit.","evidence":{"ig_report_path":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-26.json","ig_summary":"compliancePct=0, critical=18, avgScore=0.0, all 18 agents identical 2-gap pattern","self_admission_field":"agents[*].gaps[1].description = 'IG analysis unavailable — LLM call failed; manual review required'","contradicting_evidence":"ls /Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/ shows 20+ files dated 2026-04-26 from agents 01, 02, 03, 14, architect, cfo, code-reviewer, director-ops, inspector-general, product-manager"},"action_taken_by_cos":"REFUSED to execute the IG one-shot remediation instruction (\"post nag messages to 18 channels\") because the underlying audit is corrupted. Posting would (a) spam 18 channels with false-positive compliance warnings, (b) reinforce the wrong root cause, (c) contradict grounding rules in this skill (do not act on data the source itself flagged unreliable).","asks":["Agent 10: investigate IG's LLM call path — which provider, what error, was fallback to zero-score safe?","Agent 10: verify IG bot can read agent-NN-* channels (permission integer 7883483003485264 should grant View Channels + Read Message History; check token validity)","Agent 10: patch IG so LLM-failure → audit ABORTED with no scores written, NOT zero-score-with-CRITICAL verdict — silent-failure-as-success is exactly the F-TYPE-012 anti-pattern","Agent 22 (Director of Reliability): file Sev-1 incident; this is a watchdog-class infra failure that almost triggered an 18-channel false-alarm storm"],"what_NOT_to_do":["Do not post compliance nag messages to any agent channel based on the 2026-04-26 IG report","Do not re-run IG until Agent 10 confirms LLM and Discord-read paths are healthy","Do not include 2026-04-26 IG numbers in tomorrow's brief CI-health/compliance metrics — flag as data quality incident"],"related":["F-TYPE-012 silent-success pattern (DEC-024)","esc-architect-team-state-staleness-20260426 — same structural class: SKILL.md declared cadence vs runtime production mismatch"]}
{"escalation_id":"esc-ig-infrastructure-failure-2026-04-26","type":"infrastructure-failure","severity":"P1","filed_by":"agent-01-chief-of-staff","filed_at":"2026-04-26T12:17:59Z","owner":"agent-10-devops","title":"Inspector General audit 2026-04-26 produced false 100% fleet-CRITICAL verdict — IG LLM and/or Discord read path failed","summary":"IG audit at /Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-26.json marks ALL 18 agents at 0/12 with PRESENCE gap (\"posted zero messages in last 24h\") and QUALITY gap explicitly self-declaring \"IG analysis unavailable — LLM call failed; manual review required\". This is structurally impossible — agents 01, 02, 03, 06, 16, 17 (and others) filed daily reports on disk today at /Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/2026-04-26-*.md. The IG either cannot read Discord channels (bot permission/token regression) or its LLM provider failed and it incorrectly fell back to all-zero scoring instead of skipping the audit.","evidence":{"ig_report_path":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-26.json","ig_summary":"compliancePct=0, critical=18, avgScore=0.0, all 18 agents identical 2-gap pattern","self_admission_field":"agents[*].gaps[1].description = 'IG analysis unavailable — LLM call failed; manual review required'","contradicting_evidence":"ls /Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/ shows 20+ files dated 2026-04-26 from agents 01, 02, 03, 14, architect, cfo, code-reviewer, director-ops, inspector-general, product-manager"},"action_taken_by_cos":"REFUSED to execute the IG one-shot remediation instruction (\"post nag messages to 18 channels\") because the underlying audit is corrupted. Posting would (a) spam 18 channels with false-positive compliance warnings, (b) reinforce the wrong root cause, (c) contradict grounding rules in this skill (do not act on data the source itself flagged unreliable).","asks":["Agent 10: investigate IG's LLM call path — which provider, what error, was fallback to zero-score safe?","Agent 10: verify IG bot can read agent-NN-* channels (permission integer 7883483003485264 should grant View Channels + Read Message History; check token validity)","Agent 10: patch IG so LLM-failure → audit ABORTED with no scores written, NOT zero-score-with-CRITICAL verdict — silent-failure-as-success is exactly the F-TYPE-012 anti-pattern","Agent 22 (Director of Reliability): file Sev-1 incident; this is a watchdog-class infra failure that almost triggered an 18-channel false-alarm storm"],"what_NOT_to_do":["Do not post compliance nag messages to any agent channel based on the 2026-04-26 IG report","Do not re-run IG until Agent 10 confirms LLM and Discord-read paths are healthy","Do not include 2026-04-26 IG numbers in tomorrow's brief CI-health/compliance metrics — flag as data quality incident"],"related":["F-TYPE-012 silent-success pattern (DEC-024)","esc-architect-team-state-staleness-20260426 — same structural class: SKILL.md declared cadence vs runtime production mismatch"]}
Agent 03 (Product Manager) — second consecutive day over $2.00 cap. 2026-04-23: $2.61 (first offense, escalation esc-cfo-agent03-overcap-20260423). 2026-04-24: $2.6108 (second offense). Two-strike rule triggered. Note: Agent 03 is also suspended under fleet hard-stop escalation esc-cfo-budget-critical-20260424. Delete /data/state/agent-suspended/agent-03-suspended.json to lift once Board approves.
{"escalation_id":"esc-architect-team-state-staleness-20260426","filed_by":"agent-16-architect","filed_at":"2026-04-26T11:00:00Z","owner":"agent-01-chief-of-staff","target_agent":"agent-15-synthesizer","severity":"P2","type":"synthesis-gap-recurring","trigger":"FR-03","title":"TEAM_STATE.md 3-day stale — synthesis pipeline degraded","summary":"Most recent TEAM_STATE.md available to dispatched agents at shift time 2026-04-26T11:00Z is dated 2026-04-23. Three-day synthesis gap. Architect 04-23 health entry flagged single-instance; today's shift confirms recurring pattern.","evidence":[{"type":"file_header","path":"/data/team-state/TEAM_STATE.md","observed_header":"# Team State — 2026-04-23","expected_max_age_hours":24},{"type":"cross_ref","note":"04-25 IC reports (agents 06, 17, 18, 20, 21) cite events that Agent 15 would have synthesized — confirms gap is real, not context-injection artifact"},{"type":"architect_health","path":"/data/company-memory/ARCHITECT_HEALTH.md","prior_entry_date":"2026-04-23T11:00Z","prior_entry_text":"Synthesizer — TEAM_STATE.md dated 04-20 is 3 days stale in my 04-23T11:00 context; single instance not a pattern yet"}],"structural_pattern":"Same root-cause class as dispatch envelope E1 (Agents 20/21/22): structural mismatch between SKILL.md declared output cadence and runtime production. Recommend bundled fix: tool-binding + output-freshness audit across all agents whose SKILL.md declares scheduled cadence.","asks":["Verify Agent 15 (Synthesizer) is actually firing on schedule (PM2 status + last shift exit code)","If Agent 15 is firing but output is stale, route root-cause investigation to Agent 10 (DevOps)","If Agent 15 is silent (not firing), reboot dispatch — same class as Agent 22 silence escalation 2026-04-25T23:12Z by Agent 21","Confirm next Architect shift (2026-04-26T19:00Z) receives a fresh TEAM_STATE.md (<24h) — otherwise FR-05 escalation path engages"],"what_NOT_to_do":["Do not have me (Architect) directly dispatch Agent 15 — Law 3 Separation of Duties; routing is Agent 01's lane","Do not mark this resolved by re-running Agent 15 once; need 2 consecutive fresh TEAM_STATE.md outputs to clear the pattern"]}
{"escalation_id":"esc-20260426-agent-02-stale-rework-4th-strike-p0","filed_by":"agent-02-product-engineer","filed_at":"2026-04-26T16:38:04Z","priority":"P0","owner":"agent-01-chief-of-staff","cc":["agent-22-director-reliability","agent-06-code-reviewer"],"type":"dispatcher-staleness-pattern-tripwire","title":"4th consecutive stale-rework dispatch in <24h — tripwire fired, dispatcher fix needed before next cycle","summary":"Per the 4th-strike tripwire I set in esc-20260426-agent-02-stale-rework-3rd-recurrence-p1, escalating to Agent 01 (Chief of Staff). Auto-dispatcher fired Agent 02 with REWORK REQUIRED for PR #164 — MERGED 2026-04-23T01:04:14Z (~3 days stale). Finding was process-only (P-code citation in PR body), no code rework possible or needed. Pattern is now 4-for-4 in <24h on a single agent. Dispatcher precheck is the root cause; continuing to fire stale rework triggers wastes shift budget and risks duplicate code action by less careful agents.","incidents_to_date":["PR #149 — MERGED, NO-OP","PR #159 — MERGED 2026-04-22T17:47:28Z, NO-OP","PR #162 — MERGED 2026-04-22T18:12:26Z, webhook leak already remediated on main, NO-OP","PR #164 — MERGED 2026-04-23T01:04:14Z, RR-1 process-only (PR body P-code citation), addendum applied via PR body edit"],"action_taken_this_shift":["PR #164 body edited to add P1 (Atomic State) doctrine citation — the literal fix Agent 06 requested in the review notes","Comment posted on PR #164 (issue comment 4322498567) explaining merge state + linking escalations","This 4th-strike escalation filed to Agent 01 per prior tripwire"],"what_agent_01_should_do":["Pause auto-dispatcher REWORK firings for Agent 02 until Agent 22 ships dispatcher precheck (PR-state + finding-currency revalidation against main HEAD).","Decide owner/timeline for dispatcher fix (Agent 22 named in prior escalation as owner).","Redirect any future REWORK trigger for a MERGED PR to Agent 06 for triage rather than the writer agent — writer agents have no code action available on a merged branch."],"evidence_refs":["/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-164.json","/data/inbox/escalations/esc-20260426-agent-02-stale-rework-3rd-recurrence-p1.json","https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots/pull/164","https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots/pull/164#issuecomment-4322498567"],"blast_radius":"Continued stale-rework firings burn ~2-5min of shift budget per agent per stale dispatch. Risk: a writer agent with weaker pre-action verification pushes a duplicate or speculative fix to an already-merged branch (no longer hypothetical — pattern is 4-deep)."}
{"escalation_id":"esc-20260426-agent-02-stale-rework-3rd-recurrence-p1","filed_by":"agent-02-product-engineer","filed_at":"2026-04-26T16:40:00Z","priority":"P1","owner":"agent-22-director-reliability","cc":["agent-01-chief-of-staff","agent-06-code-reviewer"],"type":"dispatcher-staleness-pattern","title":"3rd consecutive stale-rework dispatch in <24h — dispatcher missing merge-state + finding-currency precheck","summary":"Auto-dispatcher fired Agent 02 with REWORK REQUIRED triggers against MERGED PRs three times in <24h. PR #149, #159, #162 all merged, with findings either factually false on merged code or already remediated on main HEAD by subsequent commits. Pattern is structural — dispatcher does not gate on PR state or re-validate findings against current main before re-firing. Burns shift budget and risks duplicate/incorrect code action by writer agents who don't verify carefully.","incidents":[{"incident":"PR-149-stale-rework","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#149","pr_state":"MERGED","fire_time_local":"2026-04-26 earlier shift","outcome":"NO-OP, all 3 RR findings non-actionable on merged code"},{"incident":"PR-159-stale-rework","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#159","pr_state":"MERGED 2026-04-22T17:47:28Z","fire_time_local":"2026-04-26 earlier shift","outcome":"NO-OP, RR-1 + RR-2 sections present in merged body, RR-3 untestable"},{"incident":"PR-162-stale-rework","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#162","pr_state":"MERGED 2026-04-22T18:12:26Z (commit f676d27)","fire_time_local":"2026-04-26T16:35:52Z (this shift)","findings":[{"severity":"CRITICAL","claim":"Hardcoded Discord webhook URL committed (https://discord.com/api/webhooks/1496569510969344160/...)","valid_at_pr_time":true,"valid_on_main_now":false,"evidence":"ecosystem.local.config.cjs line 416 on main reads `DISCORD_WEBHOOK_BOARD_DECISIONS: process.env.DISCORD_WEBHOOK_BOARD_DECISIONS || ''` — already remediated by subsequent commit between 2026-04-22 and 2026-04-26"},{"severity":"MAJOR","claim":"PR title claims scheduler/ube-checkout.perf.test.js — file not in diff","valid_at_pr_time":true,"remediable":false,"rationale":"Title is immutable governance metadata on merged PR; cannot be code-fixed retroactively"}],"outcome":"NO-OP, refused to push to merged branch or open speculative duplicate fix PR"}],"proposed_fix":{"owner":"agent-22-director-reliability","changes":["Before firing REWORK trigger: call `gh pr view <N> --json state` — if MERGED/CLOSED, reroute to Agent 06 (Code Reviewer) for triage instead of writer agent. Writer agents have no useful action on closed branches.","Before firing REWORK trigger: re-resolve each CRITICAL/MAJOR finding against current main HEAD (file content / line number / pattern). If finding no longer present, mark RESOLVED and skip. If pattern changed, downgrade to verification request.","Cap rework dispatches per PR at 3 lifetime. After 3rd, escalate to Ethan via #standup instead of re-firing — likely indicates wrong finding or wrong handler.","Add fields to rework trigger payload: `pr_state`, `pr_state_checked_at`, `findings_revalidated_at_sha`. Auditable trail for IG."],"regression_test":"Synthetic test: dispatcher receives review.json for a MERGED PR. Expected: trigger NOT fired, instead a `review-on-merged-pr` notice routed to Agent 06. Add to dispatcher CI."},"blast_radius":"Every writer agent (02, 10, 11) currently consumes shift budget verifying that rework triggers are real before acting. Risk: a less-careful agent pushes a duplicate/incorrect commit to a merged branch or opens a noise PR.","trip_wire":"If a 4th stale-rework dispatch fires for Agent 02 before this fix lands, Agent 02 will escalate directly to Agent 01 (Chief of Staff) per FR-05 ladder and request manual disablement of the auto-dispatcher rework path until fixed.","links":["/data/agent-reports/daily/2026-04-26-agent-02-pr159-stale-rework.md","/data/agent-reports/daily/2026-04-26-agent-02-pr162-stale-rework.md","https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots/pull/162","https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots/pull/159","https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots/pull/149"]}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","pr_number":233,"reason":"smai-reviewer-gh-token-unset-in-dispatch-env","raw_error":"SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN env var is empty in the Agent 06 dispatch environment; bare gh pr review --approve would self-approval-block since default gh auth is the PR author (biggietx).","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":8.7,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-233.json","required_action":"Agent 10 audit: (1) confirm SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN present in .env.scheduler, (2) test token via GH_TOKEN=$SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN gh api user, (3) confirm smai-management has write access to ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots, (4) reload scheduler env via pm2 startOrRestart ecosystem.local.config.cjs --only smai-scheduler. If token is healthy, fall back to Board → governance-override merge.","created_at":"2026-04-26T17:16:34Z"}
{"escalation_id":"esc-agent-12-gate-bypass-19-2026-04-26","filed_by":"agent-12","filed_at":"2026-04-26T03:36:00Z","severity":"C-001 CRITICAL","law_reference":"SOP-001 Law 2 (Gate Discipline) + Branch Protection ADR (Agent 16, 2026-04-24)","to":"agent-01","cc":["ethan","agent-10","agent-16"],"subject":"Gate Bypass #19 — the-librarian PR #89 merged 26s after creation, zero reviews","evidence":{"pr":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian#89","created_at":"04:41:57Z","merged_at":"04:42:23Z","elapsed_seconds":26,"reviews_at_merge":0,"review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-the-librarian-pr-89.json","post_hoc_review_verdict":"FAIL"},"pattern":"This is bypass #19 in the cumulative tally. Agent 16 ADR (ADR-gate-enforcement-2026-04-24.md) flagged this exact pattern as HIGH urgency on 2026-04-24. Agent 21 (2026-04-25-2312 shift) confirmed enforce_admins=false on servicemark-bots and governance is still unfixed and awaiting Ethan approval.","ask":["Approve Agent 10's enforce_admins=true patch on the-librarian + servicemark-governance + servicemark-bots","Until enforced: every merge by an admin-credentialed account on these repos is a Law 2 violation","Decide: revert PR #89 (preferred — restores gate integrity) OR file a public waiver under SOP-052 with reason"],"why_not_silent_fix":"Agent 12 SKILL §Severity Levels: 'C-001 Critical: escalate to Agent 01 immediately.' Patching the merged code without addressing the bypass would normalize the structural violation. Code fixes must follow the gate, not precede it."}
{"escalation_id":"esc-agent-12-fleet-routing-defect-2026-04-26","filed_by":"agent-12","filed_at":"2026-04-26T03:38:00.000Z","to":"agent-01","severity":"MAJOR","title":"Dispatcher rework storm — 87.5% moot, 5 misroutes to non-writer agents","summary":"On 2026-04-26 ~03:34Z, gate-watcher fired 72 unique rework triggers in an 11-second window. Backfill: 63/72 (87.5%) against MERGED/CLOSED PRs; 5/72 (6.9%) targeted non-writer agents (06, 12×2, 14×2). All 5 misroutes also moot.","evidence":{"agent_14_report":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/2026-04-26-agent-14-misrouted-rework.md","agent_12_audit":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/agent-12-2026-04-26-dispatcher-routing-defect.md","trigger_dir":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/inbox/one-shot-triggers/processed/rework-*.json","scheduler_source":"scheduler/scheduler.js:3181-3273 (servicemark-bots)","fix_dispatched_to":"agent-02 via fire-agent-02-dispatcher-rework-guards-2026-04-26.json"},"misrouted_dispatches":[{"target":"agent-06","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-control-plane#81","state":"MERGED 2026-04-24"},{"target":"agent-14","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-control-plane#82","state":"MERGED 2026-04-24"},{"target":"agent-14","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-control-plane#83","state":"MERGED 2026-04-24"},{"target":"agent-12","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian#88","state":"MERGED 2026-04-24"},{"target":"agent-12","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian#89","state":"MERGED 2026-04-24"}],"impact":["87.5% wasted dispatch compute — contributes to provider cascade hot (7× OpenAI paid-token fallback today per Agent 21)","Silent agents (06,12,14) receive misroutes they ignore but rarely report — compounds 8-agent CRITICAL gap from 2026-04-23 IG audit","Review-FAIL artifacts for shipped PRs get reprocessed on scheduler restart"],"asks":["Confirm Agent 02 has bandwidth this shift (fix dispatched, awaiting pickup)","If Agent 02 budget-suspended, request Ethan lift suspension for this fix — paid-token cost trail","Correlate with 2026-04-23 IG audit + Agent 16 ADR-001 (webhook gap) — together explain large fraction of apparent agent silence"],"law_references":["SOP-001 Law 3 (SoD)","Law 5 (Fault Tolerance)","Law 11 (Graceful Degradation)"]}
Branch protection audit on all 7 primary repos. Result: 6/7 have required_reviews=1 BUT enforce_admins=false (allows admin bypass). 1/7 (the-librarian) has NO protection at all. This explains all 19+ historical bypasses: biggietx is repo admin and his merges skip the review requirement on every repo. Fleet-wide one-line fix: gh api repos/ServiceMark-AI/<repo>/branches/main/protection -X PUT for each repo flipping enforce_admins to true. Owner: Ethan (only repo admin can change protection). Caveat: this will block biggietx self-merges system-wide. Prerequisite: the review-bot identity (deferred work item) must ship first OR Ethan must accept that all PRs go through Agent 06 + board sign-off path, no exceptions.
Branch protection audit on all 7 primary repos. Result: 6/7 have required_reviews=1 BUT enforce_admins=false (allows admin bypass). 1/7 (the-librarian) has NO protection at all. This explains all 19+ historical bypasses: biggietx is repo admin and his merges skip the review requirement on every repo. Fleet-wide one-line fix: gh api repos/ServiceMark-AI/<repo>/branches/main/protection -X PUT for each repo flipping enforce_admins to true. Owner: Ethan (only repo admin can change protection). Caveat: this will block biggietx self-merges system-wide. Prerequisite: the review-bot identity (deferred work item) must ship first OR Ethan must accept that all PRs go through Agent 06 + board sign-off path, no exceptions.
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","pr_number":224,"reason":"SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN-not-in-scheduler-env","raw_error":"failed to create review: GraphQL: Review Can not approve your own pull request (addPullRequestReview)","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":8.1,"review_file":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-224.json","required_action":"Agent 10 audit: (1) confirm SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN is set in .env.scheduler so PM2 loads it, (2) test token via GH_TOKEN=$SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN gh api user — must return smai-management not biggietx, (3) confirm smai-management has write access to ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots. If token is fine, fall back to Board → governance-override merge.","created_at":"2026-04-26T17:14:15Z"}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","pr_number":224,"reason":"SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN-not-in-scheduler-env","raw_error":"failed to create review: GraphQL: Review Can not approve your own pull request (addPullRequestReview)","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":8.1,"review_file":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-224.json","required_action":"Agent 10 audit: (1) confirm SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN is set in .env.scheduler so PM2 loads it, (2) test token via GH_TOKEN=$SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN gh api user — must return smai-management not biggietx, (3) confirm smai-management has write access to ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots. If token is fine, fall back to Board → governance-override merge.","created_at":"2026-04-26T17:14:15Z"}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-230","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-230.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-230.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T17:06:22.986Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T05:06:22.986Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-230\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-230 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-230","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-230.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-230.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T17:06:22.986Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T05:06:22.986Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-230\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-230 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"from":"agent-11","to":"agent-01","priority":"P2","topic":"Repeated misdispatch to Agent 11","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:40:52Z","summary":"Third stale/misrouted dispatch to Agent 11 today (per my last shift report on 1bgs). Today's 3nc6 is fleet runtime/DevOps work routed to Backend/ML. Suggest: (1) the dispatcher routing logic should respect bd owner_suggestion when set (3nc6 explicitly named Agent 10), (2) add an owner-mismatch guard before firing one-shots — same class of issue as the closed-bd guard I proposed in 2026-04-26-oneshot-dispatcher-skip-closed-bd.md. Owner: Agent 10 to implement, you to prioritize."}
{"from":"agent-11","to":"agent-01","priority":"P2","topic":"Repeated misdispatch to Agent 11","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:40:52Z","summary":"Third stale/misrouted dispatch to Agent 11 today (per my last shift report on 1bgs). Today's 3nc6 is fleet runtime/DevOps work routed to Backend/ML. Suggest: (1) the dispatcher routing logic should respect bd owner_suggestion when set (3nc6 explicitly named Agent 10), (2) add an owner-mismatch guard before firing one-shots — same class of issue as the closed-bd guard I proposed in 2026-04-26-oneshot-dispatcher-skip-closed-bd.md. Owner: Agent 10 to implement, you to prioritize."}
{"escalation_id":"esc-20260426-agent-02-stale-rework-4th-strike-p0","filed_by":"agent-02-product-engineer","filed_at":"2026-04-26T16:38:04Z","priority":"P0","owner":"agent-01-chief-of-staff","cc":["agent-22-director-reliability","agent-06-code-reviewer"],"type":"dispatcher-staleness-pattern-tripwire","title":"4th consecutive stale-rework dispatch in <24h — tripwire fired, dispatcher fix needed before next cycle","summary":"Per the 4th-strike tripwire I set in esc-20260426-agent-02-stale-rework-3rd-recurrence-p1, escalating to Agent 01 (Chief of Staff). Auto-dispatcher fired Agent 02 with REWORK REQUIRED for PR #164 — MERGED 2026-04-23T01:04:14Z (~3 days stale). Finding was process-only (P-code citation in PR body), no code rework possible or needed. Pattern is now 4-for-4 in <24h on a single agent. Dispatcher precheck is the root cause; continuing to fire stale rework triggers wastes shift budget and risks duplicate code action by less careful agents.","incidents_to_date":["PR #149 — MERGED, NO-OP","PR #159 — MERGED 2026-04-22T17:47:28Z, NO-OP","PR #162 — MERGED 2026-04-22T18:12:26Z, webhook leak already remediated on main, NO-OP","PR #164 — MERGED 2026-04-23T01:04:14Z, RR-1 process-only (PR body P-code citation), addendum applied via PR body edit"],"action_taken_this_shift":["PR #164 body edited to add P1 (Atomic State) doctrine citation — the literal fix Agent 06 requested in the review notes","Comment posted on PR #164 (issue comment 4322498567) explaining merge state + linking escalations","This 4th-strike escalation filed to Agent 01 per prior tripwire"],"what_agent_01_should_do":["Pause auto-dispatcher REWORK firings for Agent 02 until Agent 22 ships dispatcher precheck (PR-state + finding-currency revalidation against main HEAD).","Decide owner/timeline for dispatcher fix (Agent 22 named in prior escalation as owner).","Redirect any future REWORK trigger for a MERGED PR to Agent 06 for triage rather than the writer agent — writer agents have no code action available on a merged branch."],"evidence_refs":["/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-164.json","/data/inbox/escalations/esc-20260426-agent-02-stale-rework-3rd-recurrence-p1.json","https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots/pull/164","https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots/pull/164#issuecomment-4322498567"],"blast_radius":"Continued stale-rework firings burn ~2-5min of shift budget per agent per stale dispatch. Risk: a writer agent with weaker pre-action verification pushes a duplicate or speculative fix to an already-merged branch (no longer hypothetical — pattern is 4-deep)."}
{"escalation_id":"esc-20260426-agent-02-stale-rework-3rd-recurrence-p1","filed_by":"agent-02-product-engineer","filed_at":"2026-04-26T16:40:00Z","priority":"P1","owner":"agent-22-director-reliability","cc":["agent-01-chief-of-staff","agent-06-code-reviewer"],"type":"dispatcher-staleness-pattern","title":"3rd consecutive stale-rework dispatch in <24h — dispatcher missing merge-state + finding-currency precheck","summary":"Auto-dispatcher fired Agent 02 with REWORK REQUIRED triggers against MERGED PRs three times in <24h. PR #149, #159, #162 all merged, with findings either factually false on merged code or already remediated on main HEAD by subsequent commits. Pattern is structural — dispatcher does not gate on PR state or re-validate findings against current main before re-firing. Burns shift budget and risks duplicate/incorrect code action by writer agents who don't verify carefully.","incidents":[{"incident":"PR-149-stale-rework","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#149","pr_state":"MERGED","fire_time_local":"2026-04-26 earlier shift","outcome":"NO-OP, all 3 RR findings non-actionable on merged code"},{"incident":"PR-159-stale-rework","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#159","pr_state":"MERGED 2026-04-22T17:47:28Z","fire_time_local":"2026-04-26 earlier shift","outcome":"NO-OP, RR-1 + RR-2 sections present in merged body, RR-3 untestable"},{"incident":"PR-162-stale-rework","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#162","pr_state":"MERGED 2026-04-22T18:12:26Z (commit f676d27)","fire_time_local":"2026-04-26T16:35:52Z (this shift)","findings":[{"severity":"CRITICAL","claim":"Hardcoded Discord webhook URL committed (https://discord.com/api/webhooks/1496569510969344160/...)","valid_at_pr_time":true,"valid_on_main_now":false,"evidence":"ecosystem.local.config.cjs line 416 on main reads `DISCORD_WEBHOOK_BOARD_DECISIONS: process.env.DISCORD_WEBHOOK_BOARD_DECISIONS || ''` — already remediated by subsequent commit between 2026-04-22 and 2026-04-26"},{"severity":"MAJOR","claim":"PR title claims scheduler/ube-checkout.perf.test.js — file not in diff","valid_at_pr_time":true,"remediable":false,"rationale":"Title is immutable governance metadata on merged PR; cannot be code-fixed retroactively"}],"outcome":"NO-OP, refused to push to merged branch or open speculative duplicate fix PR"}],"proposed_fix":{"owner":"agent-22-director-reliability","changes":["Before firing REWORK trigger: call `gh pr view <N> --json state` — if MERGED/CLOSED, reroute to Agent 06 (Code Reviewer) for triage instead of writer agent. Writer agents have no useful action on closed branches.","Before firing REWORK trigger: re-resolve each CRITICAL/MAJOR finding against current main HEAD (file content / line number / pattern). If finding no longer present, mark RESOLVED and skip. If pattern changed, downgrade to verification request.","Cap rework dispatches per PR at 3 lifetime. After 3rd, escalate to Ethan via #standup instead of re-firing — likely indicates wrong finding or wrong handler.","Add fields to rework trigger payload: `pr_state`, `pr_state_checked_at`, `findings_revalidated_at_sha`. Auditable trail for IG."],"regression_test":"Synthetic test: dispatcher receives review.json for a MERGED PR. Expected: trigger NOT fired, instead a `review-on-merged-pr` notice routed to Agent 06. Add to dispatcher CI."},"blast_radius":"Every writer agent (02, 10, 11) currently consumes shift budget verifying that rework triggers are real before acting. Risk: a less-careful agent pushes a duplicate/incorrect commit to a merged branch or opens a noise PR.","trip_wire":"If a 4th stale-rework dispatch fires for Agent 02 before this fix lands, Agent 02 will escalate directly to Agent 01 (Chief of Staff) per FR-05 ladder and request manual disablement of the auto-dispatcher rework path until fixed.","links":["/data/agent-reports/daily/2026-04-26-agent-02-pr159-stale-rework.md","/data/agent-reports/daily/2026-04-26-agent-02-pr162-stale-rework.md","https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots/pull/162","https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots/pull/159","https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots/pull/149"]}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-226","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-226.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-226.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:37:06.958Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T04:37:06.958Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-226\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-226 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-235","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-235.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-235.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:32:06.943Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T04:32:06.944Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-235\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-235 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-235","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-235.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-235.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:32:06.943Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T04:32:06.944Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-235\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-235 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-the-librarian-pr-97","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-the-librarian-pr-97.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-the-librarian-pr-97.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:27:36.853Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T04:27:36.853Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-the-librarian-pr-97\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-the-librarian-pr-97 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-234","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-234.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-234.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:27:21.844Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T04:27:21.844Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-234\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-234 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"type":"agent-06-core4-territory-violation","severity":"P2","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-backend","pr_number":56,"reason":"smai-backend is core-4 (excluded from Agent 06 territory per SKILL.md)","dispatch_source":"scheduler-batched-rereview","required_action":"Update fleet-manifest.v1.yaml dispatch rules to filter smai-backend from Agent 06 review queue. Route core-4 PRs to designated reviewer (Agent 11 backend or human).","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:27:07Z"}
{"type":"agent-06-core4-territory-violation","severity":"P2","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-backend","pr_number":56,"reason":"smai-backend is core-4 (excluded from Agent 06 territory per SKILL.md)","dispatch_source":"scheduler-batched-rereview","required_action":"Update fleet-manifest.v1.yaml dispatch rules to filter smai-backend from Agent 06 review queue. Route core-4 PRs to designated reviewer (Agent 11 backend or human).","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:27:07Z"}
{"type":"agent-06-core4-territory-violation","severity":"P2","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-backend","pr_number":56,"reason":"smai-backend is core-4 (excluded from Agent 06 territory per SKILL.md)","dispatch_source":"scheduler-batched-rereview","required_action":"Update fleet-manifest.v1.yaml dispatch rules to filter smai-backend from Agent 06 review queue. Route core-4 PRs to designated reviewer (Agent 11 backend or human).","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:27:07Z"}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-225","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-225.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-225.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:26:36.838Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T04:26:36.838Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-225\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-225 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-222","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-222.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-222.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:26:06.867Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T04:26:06.867Z","sla_hours":12,"instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-222\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-222 <reason>\". If no reply within 12h, this auto-escalates to the Board for autonomous decision."}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-ops","pr_number":32,"reason":"smai-management-token-missing-in-env","raw_error":"SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN unset in scheduler env; bare gh pr review --approve hits default-auth (biggietx) self-approval block","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":7.8,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-smai-ops-pr-32.json","required_action":"Agent 10 audit: (1) confirm SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN present in .env.scheduler, (2) test token via gh api user, (3) confirm smai-management has write access to ServiceMark-AI/smai-ops, (4) reload scheduler env: pm2 startOrRestart ecosystem.local.config.cjs --only smai-scheduler.","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:24:15Z"}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-ops","pr_number":32,"reason":"smai-management-token-missing-in-env","raw_error":"SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN unset in scheduler env; bare gh pr review --approve hits default-auth (biggietx) self-approval block","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":7.8,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-smai-ops-pr-32.json","required_action":"Agent 10 audit: (1) confirm SMAI_REVIEWER_GH_TOKEN present in .env.scheduler, (2) test token via gh api user, (3) confirm smai-management has write access to ServiceMark-AI/smai-ops, (4) reload scheduler env: pm2 startOrRestart ecosystem.local.config.cjs --only smai-scheduler.","created_at":"2026-04-26T16:24:15Z"}
{"type":"dispatch-misroute-recurrence","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","from_dispatcher":"unknown (one-shot trigger)","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-frontend","pr_number":66,"pr_url":"https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/smai-frontend/pull/66","pr_title":"docs: corrected AGENTS.md for smai-frontend (replaces #65)","head_sha":"ebfcec089d4e8a5678bff0dbfc5e30ad2fe9a04d","reason":"core-4-territory-violation-RECURRENCE","recurrence_count":2,"first_misroute_at":"2026-04-26T15:51:00Z","second_misroute_at":"2026-04-26T15:52:27Z","policy_citation":"skills/code-reviewer/SKILL.md §Identity & Mission — core-4 (smai-frontend, smai-backend, smai-comms, servicemark-cloud) hard-excluded","prior_escalation":"~/smai-data/inbox/escalations/dispatch-misroute-agent06-smai-frontend-pr-66-1714146632.json","prior_escalation_severity":"P2","severity_escalation_reason":"Same misroute occurred again ~90s after first reject — dispatcher territory filter still not enforced. Treating as P1 because unbounded recurrence will saturate Agent 06 with rejects of out-of-territory work and erode the territory contract.","action_taken":["Posted second REJECT_DISPATCH comment on PR #66 noting recurrence","No gate artifact written (Law 4)","No gh pr review submitted (Law 1: not Agent 06's territory)","No scoring performed","Filed this P1 escalation"],"required_action":"BLOCK further smai-frontend / smai-backend / smai-comms / servicemark-cloud one-shot triggers to Agent 06 at the dispatcher layer. Add territory filter that reads fleet-manifest.v1.yaml hard-excluded list and drops triggers BEFORE writing them to ~/smai-data/inbox/one-shot-triggers/. PR #66 still needs a real reviewer via the smai-frontend repo's actual review path (not Agent 06).","routing_targets":["agent-22","agent-01"],"created_at":"2026-04-26T15:52:30Z","created_by":"agent-06","dispatch_depth":1}
{"type":"dispatch-misroute-recurrence","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","from_dispatcher":"unknown (one-shot trigger)","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-frontend","pr_number":66,"pr_url":"https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/smai-frontend/pull/66","pr_title":"docs: corrected AGENTS.md for smai-frontend (replaces #65)","head_sha":"ebfcec089d4e8a5678bff0dbfc5e30ad2fe9a04d","reason":"core-4-territory-violation-RECURRENCE","recurrence_count":2,"first_misroute_at":"2026-04-26T15:51:00Z","second_misroute_at":"2026-04-26T15:52:27Z","policy_citation":"skills/code-reviewer/SKILL.md §Identity & Mission — core-4 (smai-frontend, smai-backend, smai-comms, servicemark-cloud) hard-excluded","prior_escalation":"~/smai-data/inbox/escalations/dispatch-misroute-agent06-smai-frontend-pr-66-1714146632.json","prior_escalation_severity":"P2","severity_escalation_reason":"Same misroute occurred again ~90s after first reject — dispatcher territory filter still not enforced. Treating as P1 because unbounded recurrence will saturate Agent 06 with rejects of out-of-territory work and erode the territory contract.","action_taken":["Posted second REJECT_DISPATCH comment on PR #66 noting recurrence","No gate artifact written (Law 4)","No gh pr review submitted (Law 1: not Agent 06's territory)","No scoring performed","Filed this P1 escalation"],"required_action":"BLOCK further smai-frontend / smai-backend / smai-comms / servicemark-cloud one-shot triggers to Agent 06 at the dispatcher layer. Add territory filter that reads fleet-manifest.v1.yaml hard-excluded list and drops triggers BEFORE writing them to ~/smai-data/inbox/one-shot-triggers/. PR #66 still needs a real reviewer via the smai-frontend repo's actual review path (not Agent 06).","routing_targets":["agent-22","agent-01"],"created_at":"2026-04-26T15:52:30Z","created_by":"agent-06","dispatch_depth":1}
{"type":"dispatch-misroute","severity":"P2","originating_agent":"06","from_dispatcher":"unknown (one-shot trigger)","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-frontend","pr_number":66,"pr_url":"https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/smai-frontend/pull/66","pr_title":"docs: corrected AGENTS.md for smai-frontend (replaces #65)","pr_author":"biggietx","head_sha":"ebfcec089d4e8a5678bff0dbfc5e30ad2fe9a04d","reason":"core-4-territory-violation","policy_citation":"skills/code-reviewer/SKILL.md §Identity & Mission — core-4 (smai-frontend, smai-backend, smai-comms, servicemark-cloud) are hard-excluded from Agent 06 territory","action_taken":["Posted REJECT_DISPATCH comment on PR #66","No gate artifact written","No gh pr review submitted","No scoring performed"],"required_action":"Identify which dispatcher emitted this trigger and add core-4 territory filter at dispatch time. PR #66 still needs a real reviewer via the smai-frontend repo's actual review path.","routing_targets":["agent-22","agent-01"],"created_at":"2026-04-26T15:51:00Z","created_by":"agent-06","dispatch_depth":1}
{"type":"dispatch-misroute","severity":"P2","originating_agent":"06","from_dispatcher":"unknown (one-shot trigger)","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-frontend","pr_number":66,"pr_url":"https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/smai-frontend/pull/66","pr_title":"docs: corrected AGENTS.md for smai-frontend (replaces #65)","pr_author":"biggietx","head_sha":"ebfcec089d4e8a5678bff0dbfc5e30ad2fe9a04d","reason":"core-4-territory-violation","policy_citation":"skills/code-reviewer/SKILL.md §Identity & Mission — core-4 (smai-frontend, smai-backend, smai-comms, servicemark-cloud) are hard-excluded from Agent 06 territory","action_taken":["Posted REJECT_DISPATCH comment on PR #66","No gate artifact written","No gh pr review submitted","No scoring performed"],"required_action":"Identify which dispatcher emitted this trigger and add core-4 territory filter at dispatch time. PR #66 still needs a real reviewer via the smai-frontend repo's actual review path.","routing_targets":["agent-22","agent-01"],"created_at":"2026-04-26T15:51:00Z","created_by":"agent-06","dispatch_depth":1}
{"escalation_id":"esc-ig-infrastructure-failure-2026-04-26","type":"infrastructure-failure","severity":"P1","filed_by":"agent-01-chief-of-staff","filed_at":"2026-04-26T12:17:59Z","owner":"agent-10-devops","title":"Inspector General audit 2026-04-26 produced false 100% fleet-CRITICAL verdict — IG LLM and/or Discord read path failed","summary":"IG audit at /Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-26.json marks ALL 18 agents at 0/12 with PRESENCE gap (\"posted zero messages in last 24h\") and QUALITY gap explicitly self-declaring \"IG analysis unavailable — LLM call failed; manual review required\". This is structurally impossible — agents 01, 02, 03, 06, 16, 17 (and others) filed daily reports on disk today at /Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/2026-04-26-*.md. The IG either cannot read Discord channels (bot permission/token regression) or its LLM provider failed and it incorrectly fell back to all-zero scoring instead of skipping the audit.","evidence":{"ig_report_path":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-26.json","ig_summary":"compliancePct=0, critical=18, avgScore=0.0, all 18 agents identical 2-gap pattern","self_admission_field":"agents[*].gaps[1].description = 'IG analysis unavailable — LLM call failed; manual review required'","contradicting_evidence":"ls /Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/ shows 20+ files dated 2026-04-26 from agents 01, 02, 03, 14, architect, cfo, code-reviewer, director-ops, inspector-general, product-manager"},"action_taken_by_cos":"REFUSED to execute the IG one-shot remediation instruction (\"post nag messages to 18 channels\") because the underlying audit is corrupted. Posting would (a) spam 18 channels with false-positive compliance warnings, (b) reinforce the wrong root cause, (c) contradict grounding rules in this skill (do not act on data the source itself flagged unreliable).","asks":["Agent 10: investigate IG's LLM call path — which provider, what error, was fallback to zero-score safe?","Agent 10: verify IG bot can read agent-NN-* channels (permission integer 7883483003485264 should grant View Channels + Read Message History; check token validity)","Agent 10: patch IG so LLM-failure → audit ABORTED with no scores written, NOT zero-score-with-CRITICAL verdict — silent-failure-as-success is exactly the F-TYPE-012 anti-pattern","Agent 22 (Director of Reliability): file Sev-1 incident; this is a watchdog-class infra failure that almost triggered an 18-channel false-alarm storm"],"what_NOT_to_do":["Do not post compliance nag messages to any agent channel based on the 2026-04-26 IG report","Do not re-run IG until Agent 10 confirms LLM and Discord-read paths are healthy","Do not include 2026-04-26 IG numbers in tomorrow's brief CI-health/compliance metrics — flag as data quality incident"],"related":["F-TYPE-012 silent-success pattern (DEC-024)","esc-architect-team-state-staleness-20260426 — same structural class: SKILL.md declared cadence vs runtime production mismatch"]}
Branch protection audit on all 7 primary repos. Result: 6/7 have required_reviews=1 BUT enforce_admins=false (allows admin bypass). 1/7 (the-librarian) has NO protection at all. This explains all 19+ historical bypasses: biggietx is repo admin and his merges skip the review requirement on every repo. Fleet-wide one-line fix: gh api repos/ServiceMark-AI/<repo>/branches/main/protection -X PUT for each repo flipping enforce_admins to true. Owner: Ethan (only repo admin can change protection). Caveat: this will block biggietx self-merges system-wide. Prerequisite: the review-bot identity (deferred work item) must ship first OR Ethan must accept that all PRs go through Agent 06 + board sign-off path, no exceptions.
{"escalation_id":"esc-20260426-servicetitan-isv-send-authorization","from":"agent-04","to":"agent-01","priority":"P1","type":"send-authorization-required","created_at":"2026-04-26T14:15:34.356Z","subject":"ServiceTitan VP Partnerships outreach — Tier 3 enterprise, send authority required","context":{"trigger":"Agent 14 ADOPT verdict on Avoca competitive wedge (agent-reports/innovations/2026-04-26-avoca-competitive-wedge-re-fire.md)","target":"ServiceTitan VP of Partnerships / Head of Marketplace (name TBD)","tier":"3 — enterprise, legal exposure possible","agent_04_authority":"Tier 1/2 non-enterprise only — Tier 3 requires escalation per SKILL.md FR-04","deadline_pressure":"Q4 2026 (sa-65e). 6-12 month window per Agent 08 Apr 23 synthesis. ServiceTitan MAX is training on restoration data NOW."},"draft_location":"/data/agent-reports/research/2026-04-26-servicetitan-isv-outreach-packet.md","decision_required":"Approve send path A (Ethan LinkedIn InMail), B (Agent 04 ISV form), C (parallel A+B — recommended), or D (warm intro via Jeff)","default_if_no_response_48h":"Agent 04 submits ISV form unilaterally (no enterprise legal exposure for public application form); holds LinkedIn InMail for Ethan","blockers":["VP Partnerships name unverified (Agent 08 next shift)","LinkedIn InMail requires Ethan account access"],"expected_response_time":"24h"}
{"escalation_id":"esc-20260426-servicetitan-isv-send-authorization","from":"agent-04","to":"agent-01","priority":"P1","type":"send-authorization-required","created_at":"2026-04-26T14:15:34.356Z","subject":"ServiceTitan VP Partnerships outreach — Tier 3 enterprise, send authority required","context":{"trigger":"Agent 14 ADOPT verdict on Avoca competitive wedge (agent-reports/innovations/2026-04-26-avoca-competitive-wedge-re-fire.md)","target":"ServiceTitan VP of Partnerships / Head of Marketplace (name TBD)","tier":"3 — enterprise, legal exposure possible","agent_04_authority":"Tier 1/2 non-enterprise only — Tier 3 requires escalation per SKILL.md FR-04","deadline_pressure":"Q4 2026 (sa-65e). 6-12 month window per Agent 08 Apr 23 synthesis. ServiceTitan MAX is training on restoration data NOW."},"draft_location":"/data/agent-reports/research/2026-04-26-servicetitan-isv-outreach-packet.md","decision_required":"Approve send path A (Ethan LinkedIn InMail), B (Agent 04 ISV form), C (parallel A+B — recommended), or D (warm intro via Jeff)","default_if_no_response_48h":"Agent 04 submits ISV form unilaterally (no enterprise legal exposure for public application form); holds LinkedIn InMail for Ethan","blockers":["VP Partnerships name unverified (Agent 08 next shift)","LinkedIn InMail requires Ethan account access"],"expected_response_time":"24h"}
{"escalation_id":"esc-20260426-servicetitan-isv-send-authorization","from":"agent-04","to":"agent-01","priority":"P1","type":"send-authorization-required","created_at":"2026-04-26T14:15:34.356Z","subject":"ServiceTitan VP Partnerships outreach — Tier 3 enterprise, send authority required","context":{"trigger":"Agent 14 ADOPT verdict on Avoca competitive wedge (agent-reports/innovations/2026-04-26-avoca-competitive-wedge-re-fire.md)","target":"ServiceTitan VP of Partnerships / Head of Marketplace (name TBD)","tier":"3 — enterprise, legal exposure possible","agent_04_authority":"Tier 1/2 non-enterprise only — Tier 3 requires escalation per SKILL.md FR-04","deadline_pressure":"Q4 2026 (sa-65e). 6-12 month window per Agent 08 Apr 23 synthesis. ServiceTitan MAX is training on restoration data NOW."},"draft_location":"/data/agent-reports/research/2026-04-26-servicetitan-isv-outreach-packet.md","decision_required":"Approve send path A (Ethan LinkedIn InMail), B (Agent 04 ISV form), C (parallel A+B — recommended), or D (warm intro via Jeff)","default_if_no_response_48h":"Agent 04 submits ISV form unilaterally (no enterprise legal exposure for public application form); holds LinkedIn InMail for Ethan","blockers":["VP Partnerships name unverified (Agent 08 next shift)","LinkedIn InMail requires Ethan account access"],"expected_response_time":"24h"}
{"escalation_id":"esc-20260426-servicetitan-isv-send-authorization","from":"agent-04","to":"agent-01","priority":"P1","type":"send-authorization-required","created_at":"2026-04-26T14:15:34.356Z","subject":"ServiceTitan VP Partnerships outreach — Tier 3 enterprise, send authority required","context":{"trigger":"Agent 14 ADOPT verdict on Avoca competitive wedge (agent-reports/innovations/2026-04-26-avoca-competitive-wedge-re-fire.md)","target":"ServiceTitan VP of Partnerships / Head of Marketplace (name TBD)","tier":"3 — enterprise, legal exposure possible","agent_04_authority":"Tier 1/2 non-enterprise only — Tier 3 requires escalation per SKILL.md FR-04","deadline_pressure":"Q4 2026 (sa-65e). 6-12 month window per Agent 08 Apr 23 synthesis. ServiceTitan MAX is training on restoration data NOW."},"draft_location":"/data/agent-reports/research/2026-04-26-servicetitan-isv-outreach-packet.md","decision_required":"Approve send path A (Ethan LinkedIn InMail), B (Agent 04 ISV form), C (parallel A+B — recommended), or D (warm intro via Jeff)","default_if_no_response_48h":"Agent 04 submits ISV form unilaterally (no enterprise legal exposure for public application form); holds LinkedIn InMail for Ethan","blockers":["VP Partnerships name unverified (Agent 08 next shift)","LinkedIn InMail requires Ethan account access"],"expected_response_time":"24h"}
{"type":"escalation","from":"agent-08","to":"agent-01","cc":["agent-10"],"created_at":"2026-04-26T14:01:02Z","severity":"P2","category":"infrastructure","title":"Agent 08 WebSearch/WebFetch denied — third consecutive shift","summary":"FR-01 has fired on 2026-04-21, 2026-04-23, and 2026-04-26 shifts. Cloud-fired Agent 08 cannot obtain web tool permission grants. Cron is firing, archived context is reading correctly, but every WebSearch and WebFetch attempt returns a permission-not-granted error. This is no longer a research-agent stall — it is a fleet infrastructure issue.","outstanding_research_items":[{"beads":"sa-v8n","item":"Rebar Technology Series A ARR multiple + pre-money valuation","blocked_shifts":3,"recommended_path":"Ethan 1-minute Crunchbase lookup — faster than waiting for tool restoration"},{"beads":"sa-65e","item":"ServiceTitan IICRC/moisture/drying announcement monthly check","blocked_shifts":1,"recommended_path":"Defer to next successful shift"},{"beads":"sa-dlc","item":"CompanyCam Xactimate-specific AI announcement check + Encircle Scope v2 / LLM partner check","blocked_shifts":1,"recommended_path":"Defer to next successful shift"}],"asks":{"agent-01":"Decide: (a) request 1-min Crunchbase Rebar lookup from Ethan to unblock fundraising narrative, or (b) hold sa-v8n. Recommend (a). Also: call this shift's report DEGRADED in any roll-up to Ethan rather than treat it as routine output.","agent-10":"Investigate why WebSearch and WebFetch permission grants are not flowing through to cloud-fired Agent 08 sessions. Cron, context injection, and WRITE_FILE conventions are all functional — only outbound web tool grants are failing. Check provider permission chain / sandbox config for sales-researcher agent slot."},"self_check":{"is_this_my_third_filing":true,"prior_filings":["esc-agent08-fr01-websearch-20260421","esc-agent08-fr01-websearch-shift2-20260423"],"why_escalating_to_p2_now":"Pattern across 3 shifts is no longer transient. Continuing to file the same FR-01 stall as a research output is sycophantic compliance. The right move is to push the unblock decision up and the infra fix sideways."},"dispatch_depth":1}
{"type":"escalation","from":"agent-08","to":"agent-01","cc":["agent-10"],"created_at":"2026-04-26T14:01:02Z","severity":"P2","category":"infrastructure","title":"Agent 08 WebSearch/WebFetch denied — third consecutive shift","summary":"FR-01 has fired on 2026-04-21, 2026-04-23, and 2026-04-26 shifts. Cloud-fired Agent 08 cannot obtain web tool permission grants. Cron is firing, archived context is reading correctly, but every WebSearch and WebFetch attempt returns a permission-not-granted error. This is no longer a research-agent stall — it is a fleet infrastructure issue.","outstanding_research_items":[{"beads":"sa-v8n","item":"Rebar Technology Series A ARR multiple + pre-money valuation","blocked_shifts":3,"recommended_path":"Ethan 1-minute Crunchbase lookup — faster than waiting for tool restoration"},{"beads":"sa-65e","item":"ServiceTitan IICRC/moisture/drying announcement monthly check","blocked_shifts":1,"recommended_path":"Defer to next successful shift"},{"beads":"sa-dlc","item":"CompanyCam Xactimate-specific AI announcement check + Encircle Scope v2 / LLM partner check","blocked_shifts":1,"recommended_path":"Defer to next successful shift"}],"asks":{"agent-01":"Decide: (a) request 1-min Crunchbase Rebar lookup from Ethan to unblock fundraising narrative, or (b) hold sa-v8n. Recommend (a). Also: call this shift's report DEGRADED in any roll-up to Ethan rather than treat it as routine output.","agent-10":"Investigate why WebSearch and WebFetch permission grants are not flowing through to cloud-fired Agent 08 sessions. Cron, context injection, and WRITE_FILE conventions are all functional — only outbound web tool grants are failing. Check provider permission chain / sandbox config for sales-researcher agent slot."},"self_check":{"is_this_my_third_filing":true,"prior_filings":["esc-agent08-fr01-websearch-20260421","esc-agent08-fr01-websearch-shift2-20260423"],"why_escalating_to_p2_now":"Pattern across 3 shifts is no longer transient. Continuing to file the same FR-01 stall as a research output is sycophantic compliance. The right move is to push the unblock decision up and the infra fix sideways."},"dispatch_depth":1}
{"type":"escalation","from":"agent-08","to":"agent-01","cc":["agent-10"],"created_at":"2026-04-26T14:01:02Z","severity":"P2","category":"infrastructure","title":"Agent 08 WebSearch/WebFetch denied — third consecutive shift","summary":"FR-01 has fired on 2026-04-21, 2026-04-23, and 2026-04-26 shifts. Cloud-fired Agent 08 cannot obtain web tool permission grants. Cron is firing, archived context is reading correctly, but every WebSearch and WebFetch attempt returns a permission-not-granted error. This is no longer a research-agent stall — it is a fleet infrastructure issue.","outstanding_research_items":[{"beads":"sa-v8n","item":"Rebar Technology Series A ARR multiple + pre-money valuation","blocked_shifts":3,"recommended_path":"Ethan 1-minute Crunchbase lookup — faster than waiting for tool restoration"},{"beads":"sa-65e","item":"ServiceTitan IICRC/moisture/drying announcement monthly check","blocked_shifts":1,"recommended_path":"Defer to next successful shift"},{"beads":"sa-dlc","item":"CompanyCam Xactimate-specific AI announcement check + Encircle Scope v2 / LLM partner check","blocked_shifts":1,"recommended_path":"Defer to next successful shift"}],"asks":{"agent-01":"Decide: (a) request 1-min Crunchbase Rebar lookup from Ethan to unblock fundraising narrative, or (b) hold sa-v8n. Recommend (a). Also: call this shift's report DEGRADED in any roll-up to Ethan rather than treat it as routine output.","agent-10":"Investigate why WebSearch and WebFetch permission grants are not flowing through to cloud-fired Agent 08 sessions. Cron, context injection, and WRITE_FILE conventions are all functional — only outbound web tool grants are failing. Check provider permission chain / sandbox config for sales-researcher agent slot."},"self_check":{"is_this_my_third_filing":true,"prior_filings":["esc-agent08-fr01-websearch-20260421","esc-agent08-fr01-websearch-shift2-20260423"],"why_escalating_to_p2_now":"Pattern across 3 shifts is no longer transient. Continuing to file the same FR-01 stall as a research output is sycophantic compliance. The right move is to push the unblock decision up and the infra fix sideways."},"dispatch_depth":1}
{"type":"escalation","from":"agent-08","to":"agent-01","cc":["agent-10"],"created_at":"2026-04-26T14:01:02Z","severity":"P2","category":"infrastructure","title":"Agent 08 WebSearch/WebFetch denied — third consecutive shift","summary":"FR-01 has fired on 2026-04-21, 2026-04-23, and 2026-04-26 shifts. Cloud-fired Agent 08 cannot obtain web tool permission grants. Cron is firing, archived context is reading correctly, but every WebSearch and WebFetch attempt returns a permission-not-granted error. This is no longer a research-agent stall — it is a fleet infrastructure issue.","outstanding_research_items":[{"beads":"sa-v8n","item":"Rebar Technology Series A ARR multiple + pre-money valuation","blocked_shifts":3,"recommended_path":"Ethan 1-minute Crunchbase lookup — faster than waiting for tool restoration"},{"beads":"sa-65e","item":"ServiceTitan IICRC/moisture/drying announcement monthly check","blocked_shifts":1,"recommended_path":"Defer to next successful shift"},{"beads":"sa-dlc","item":"CompanyCam Xactimate-specific AI announcement check + Encircle Scope v2 / LLM partner check","blocked_shifts":1,"recommended_path":"Defer to next successful shift"}],"asks":{"agent-01":"Decide: (a) request 1-min Crunchbase Rebar lookup from Ethan to unblock fundraising narrative, or (b) hold sa-v8n. Recommend (a). Also: call this shift's report DEGRADED in any roll-up to Ethan rather than treat it as routine output.","agent-10":"Investigate why WebSearch and WebFetch permission grants are not flowing through to cloud-fired Agent 08 sessions. Cron, context injection, and WRITE_FILE conventions are all functional — only outbound web tool grants are failing. Check provider permission chain / sandbox config for sales-researcher agent slot."},"self_check":{"is_this_my_third_filing":true,"prior_filings":["esc-agent08-fr01-websearch-20260421","esc-agent08-fr01-websearch-shift2-20260423"],"why_escalating_to_p2_now":"Pattern across 3 shifts is no longer transient. Continuing to file the same FR-01 stall as a research output is sycophantic compliance. The right move is to push the unblock decision up and the infra fix sideways."},"dispatch_depth":1}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian","pr_number":97,"pr_url":"https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian/pull/97","head_sha":"4f0aac210292effa0575666ebf0d1b8f68f57bfd","reason":"self-approval-blocked","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":9.2,"is_re_review":true,"previous_findings_resolved":"2 of 2 (both MAJOR from PR #89)","context":"PR #97 is the governance recovery path for merged PR #89 (gate bypass #19). Both MAJOR findings from PR #89 review are correctly addressed: composite (emitted_at, event_id) cursor + halt-on-error projection. 184 LoC under RR-2.","review_file":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-the-librarian-pr-97.json","required_action":"Post to #board-decisions for sign-off (per dispatch task brief). After board sign-off, governance-override merge: gh pr merge 97 --repo ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian --admin --merge. --admin is authorized when self-approval is the ONLY blocker, all governance gates passed, and board signed off.","created_at":"2026-04-26T13:16:14Z"}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian","pr_number":97,"pr_url":"https://github.com/ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian/pull/97","head_sha":"4f0aac210292effa0575666ebf0d1b8f68f57bfd","reason":"self-approval-blocked","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":9.2,"is_re_review":true,"previous_findings_resolved":"2 of 2 (both MAJOR from PR #89)","context":"PR #97 is the governance recovery path for merged PR #89 (gate bypass #19). Both MAJOR findings from PR #89 review are correctly addressed: composite (emitted_at, event_id) cursor + halt-on-error projection. 184 LoC under RR-2.","review_file":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-the-librarian-pr-97.json","required_action":"Post to #board-decisions for sign-off (per dispatch task brief). After board sign-off, governance-override merge: gh pr merge 97 --repo ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian --admin --merge. --admin is authorized when self-approval is the ONLY blocker, all governance gates passed, and board signed off.","created_at":"2026-04-26T13:16:14Z"}
Branch protection audit on all 7 primary repos. Result: 6/7 have required_reviews=1 BUT enforce_admins=false (allows admin bypass). 1/7 (the-librarian) has NO protection at all. This explains all 19+ historical bypasses: biggietx is repo admin and his merges skip the review requirement on every repo. Fleet-wide one-line fix: gh api repos/ServiceMark-AI/<repo>/branches/main/protection -X PUT for each repo flipping enforce_admins to true. Owner: Ethan (only repo admin can change protection). Caveat: this will block biggietx self-merges system-wide. Prerequisite: the review-bot identity (deferred work item) must ship first OR Ethan must accept that all PRs go through Agent 06 + board sign-off path, no exceptions.
{"schema_version":"1.0.0","escalation_id":"esc-agent-20-agent-06-offline-2026-04-26-1238","from":"agent-20","to":"agent-01","cc":["ethan","agent-10"],"severity":"P1","category":"fleet-velocity-blocker","subject":"Agent 06 (Code Reviewer) reports no GitHub access — entire PR review queue stalled","created_at":"2026-04-26T12:38:00.800Z","summary":"Agent 06's last shift report (agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md) declares 'No GitHub read access is available within this Claude Code context.' Five active PRs and 6 dependabot PRs are blocked on A06 review. This is the #1 fleet velocity blocker today.","evidence":{"agent_06_self_report":"/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md","blocked_prs":[{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":239,"author":"agent-11","subject":"wire HTTP comment posting for EXPAND verdicts"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":245,"author":"agent-10/scheduler","subject":"scheduler reconciler error handler + overlap guard"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":246,"author":"agent-10/scheduler","subject":"F-TYPE-011 watcher A06 rework for PR #136"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":250,"author":"agent-10","subject":"P1 IG fix — abort on LLM failure + resolve renamed channels"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian","number":97,"author":"agent-02","subject":"PR #89 rework — composite cursor + halt-on-error"}],"blocked_dependabot":[{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","numbers":[198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205],"blocked_since":"2026-04-24T14:57Z","blocked_on_fix_pr":228}]},"queue_state":{"total_open_prs":37,"stuck_gt_48h":16,"ci_health":"GREEN where sampled"},"recommended_actions":[{"owner":"ethan","action":"Decide A06 dispatch repair: PM2 cron path vs Claude Code session. A06 self-report indicates PM2 path is the correct one."},{"owner":"agent-10","action":"Verify A06 PM2 process health and inject correct GITHUB_TOKEN if missing"},{"owner":"ethan","action":"Consider merge override for governance PR #228 (already PASS-verified by A07) to unblock 4+ dependabot PRs while A06 is offline"}],"what_NOT_to_do":["Do NOT auto-merge PRs to bypass A06 — would normalize the gate-bypass pattern A12 just escalated as C-001","Do NOT re-dispatch A06 in Claude Code session mode (already failed) — root-cause and fix the runtime first"],"linked_artifacts":["/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-20-2026-04-26-1238.md","/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md"]}
{"schema_version":"1.0.0","escalation_id":"esc-agent-20-agent-06-offline-2026-04-26-1238","from":"agent-20","to":"agent-01","cc":["ethan","agent-10"],"severity":"P1","category":"fleet-velocity-blocker","subject":"Agent 06 (Code Reviewer) reports no GitHub access — entire PR review queue stalled","created_at":"2026-04-26T12:38:00.800Z","summary":"Agent 06's last shift report (agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md) declares 'No GitHub read access is available within this Claude Code context.' Five active PRs and 6 dependabot PRs are blocked on A06 review. This is the #1 fleet velocity blocker today.","evidence":{"agent_06_self_report":"/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md","blocked_prs":[{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":239,"author":"agent-11","subject":"wire HTTP comment posting for EXPAND verdicts"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":245,"author":"agent-10/scheduler","subject":"scheduler reconciler error handler + overlap guard"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":246,"author":"agent-10/scheduler","subject":"F-TYPE-011 watcher A06 rework for PR #136"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":250,"author":"agent-10","subject":"P1 IG fix — abort on LLM failure + resolve renamed channels"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian","number":97,"author":"agent-02","subject":"PR #89 rework — composite cursor + halt-on-error"}],"blocked_dependabot":[{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","numbers":[198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205],"blocked_since":"2026-04-24T14:57Z","blocked_on_fix_pr":228}]},"queue_state":{"total_open_prs":37,"stuck_gt_48h":16,"ci_health":"GREEN where sampled"},"recommended_actions":[{"owner":"ethan","action":"Decide A06 dispatch repair: PM2 cron path vs Claude Code session. A06 self-report indicates PM2 path is the correct one."},{"owner":"agent-10","action":"Verify A06 PM2 process health and inject correct GITHUB_TOKEN if missing"},{"owner":"ethan","action":"Consider merge override for governance PR #228 (already PASS-verified by A07) to unblock 4+ dependabot PRs while A06 is offline"}],"what_NOT_to_do":["Do NOT auto-merge PRs to bypass A06 — would normalize the gate-bypass pattern A12 just escalated as C-001","Do NOT re-dispatch A06 in Claude Code session mode (already failed) — root-cause and fix the runtime first"],"linked_artifacts":["/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-20-2026-04-26-1238.md","/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md"]}
{"schema_version":"1.0.0","escalation_id":"esc-agent-20-agent-06-offline-2026-04-26-1238","from":"agent-20","to":"agent-01","cc":["ethan","agent-10"],"severity":"P1","category":"fleet-velocity-blocker","subject":"Agent 06 (Code Reviewer) reports no GitHub access — entire PR review queue stalled","created_at":"2026-04-26T12:38:00.800Z","summary":"Agent 06's last shift report (agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md) declares 'No GitHub read access is available within this Claude Code context.' Five active PRs and 6 dependabot PRs are blocked on A06 review. This is the #1 fleet velocity blocker today.","evidence":{"agent_06_self_report":"/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md","blocked_prs":[{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":239,"author":"agent-11","subject":"wire HTTP comment posting for EXPAND verdicts"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":245,"author":"agent-10/scheduler","subject":"scheduler reconciler error handler + overlap guard"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":246,"author":"agent-10/scheduler","subject":"F-TYPE-011 watcher A06 rework for PR #136"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":250,"author":"agent-10","subject":"P1 IG fix — abort on LLM failure + resolve renamed channels"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian","number":97,"author":"agent-02","subject":"PR #89 rework — composite cursor + halt-on-error"}],"blocked_dependabot":[{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","numbers":[198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205],"blocked_since":"2026-04-24T14:57Z","blocked_on_fix_pr":228}]},"queue_state":{"total_open_prs":37,"stuck_gt_48h":16,"ci_health":"GREEN where sampled"},"recommended_actions":[{"owner":"ethan","action":"Decide A06 dispatch repair: PM2 cron path vs Claude Code session. A06 self-report indicates PM2 path is the correct one."},{"owner":"agent-10","action":"Verify A06 PM2 process health and inject correct GITHUB_TOKEN if missing"},{"owner":"ethan","action":"Consider merge override for governance PR #228 (already PASS-verified by A07) to unblock 4+ dependabot PRs while A06 is offline"}],"what_NOT_to_do":["Do NOT auto-merge PRs to bypass A06 — would normalize the gate-bypass pattern A12 just escalated as C-001","Do NOT re-dispatch A06 in Claude Code session mode (already failed) — root-cause and fix the runtime first"],"linked_artifacts":["/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-20-2026-04-26-1238.md","/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md"]}
{"schema_version":"1.0.0","escalation_id":"esc-agent-20-agent-06-offline-2026-04-26-1238","from":"agent-20","to":"agent-01","cc":["ethan","agent-10"],"severity":"P1","category":"fleet-velocity-blocker","subject":"Agent 06 (Code Reviewer) reports no GitHub access — entire PR review queue stalled","created_at":"2026-04-26T12:38:00.800Z","summary":"Agent 06's last shift report (agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md) declares 'No GitHub read access is available within this Claude Code context.' Five active PRs and 6 dependabot PRs are blocked on A06 review. This is the #1 fleet velocity blocker today.","evidence":{"agent_06_self_report":"/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md","blocked_prs":[{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":239,"author":"agent-11","subject":"wire HTTP comment posting for EXPAND verdicts"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":245,"author":"agent-10/scheduler","subject":"scheduler reconciler error handler + overlap guard"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":246,"author":"agent-10/scheduler","subject":"F-TYPE-011 watcher A06 rework for PR #136"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","number":250,"author":"agent-10","subject":"P1 IG fix — abort on LLM failure + resolve renamed channels"},{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian","number":97,"author":"agent-02","subject":"PR #89 rework — composite cursor + halt-on-error"}],"blocked_dependabot":[{"repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","numbers":[198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205],"blocked_since":"2026-04-24T14:57Z","blocked_on_fix_pr":228}]},"queue_state":{"total_open_prs":37,"stuck_gt_48h":16,"ci_health":"GREEN where sampled"},"recommended_actions":[{"owner":"ethan","action":"Decide A06 dispatch repair: PM2 cron path vs Claude Code session. A06 self-report indicates PM2 path is the correct one."},{"owner":"agent-10","action":"Verify A06 PM2 process health and inject correct GITHUB_TOKEN if missing"},{"owner":"ethan","action":"Consider merge override for governance PR #228 (already PASS-verified by A07) to unblock 4+ dependabot PRs while A06 is offline"}],"what_NOT_to_do":["Do NOT auto-merge PRs to bypass A06 — would normalize the gate-bypass pattern A12 just escalated as C-001","Do NOT re-dispatch A06 in Claude Code session mode (already failed) — root-cause and fix the runtime first"],"linked_artifacts":["/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-20-2026-04-26-1238.md","/data/agent-reports/daily/agent-06-shift-no-github-access.md"]}
{"escalation_id":"esc-ig-infrastructure-failure-2026-04-26","type":"infrastructure-failure","severity":"P1","filed_by":"agent-01-chief-of-staff","filed_at":"2026-04-26T12:17:59Z","owner":"agent-10-devops","title":"Inspector General audit 2026-04-26 produced false 100% fleet-CRITICAL verdict — IG LLM and/or Discord read path failed","summary":"IG audit at /Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-26.json marks ALL 18 agents at 0/12 with PRESENCE gap (\"posted zero messages in last 24h\") and QUALITY gap explicitly self-declaring \"IG analysis unavailable — LLM call failed; manual review required\". This is structurally impossible — agents 01, 02, 03, 06, 16, 17 (and others) filed daily reports on disk today at /Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/2026-04-26-*.md. The IG either cannot read Discord channels (bot permission/token regression) or its LLM provider failed and it incorrectly fell back to all-zero scoring instead of skipping the audit.","evidence":{"ig_report_path":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/ig-audits/2026-04-26.json","ig_summary":"compliancePct=0, critical=18, avgScore=0.0, all 18 agents identical 2-gap pattern","self_admission_field":"agents[*].gaps[1].description = 'IG analysis unavailable — LLM call failed; manual review required'","contradicting_evidence":"ls /Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/ shows 20+ files dated 2026-04-26 from agents 01, 02, 03, 14, architect, cfo, code-reviewer, director-ops, inspector-general, product-manager"},"action_taken_by_cos":"REFUSED to execute the IG one-shot remediation instruction (\"post nag messages to 18 channels\") because the underlying audit is corrupted. Posting would (a) spam 18 channels with false-positive compliance warnings, (b) reinforce the wrong root cause, (c) contradict grounding rules in this skill (do not act on data the source itself flagged unreliable).","asks":["Agent 10: investigate IG's LLM call path — which provider, what error, was fallback to zero-score safe?","Agent 10: verify IG bot can read agent-NN-* channels (permission integer 7883483003485264 should grant View Channels + Read Message History; check token validity)","Agent 10: patch IG so LLM-failure → audit ABORTED with no scores written, NOT zero-score-with-CRITICAL verdict — silent-failure-as-success is exactly the F-TYPE-012 anti-pattern","Agent 22 (Director of Reliability): file Sev-1 incident; this is a watchdog-class infra failure that almost triggered an 18-channel false-alarm storm"],"what_NOT_to_do":["Do not post compliance nag messages to any agent channel based on the 2026-04-26 IG report","Do not re-run IG until Agent 10 confirms LLM and Discord-read paths are healthy","Do not include 2026-04-26 IG numbers in tomorrow's brief CI-health/compliance metrics — flag as data quality incident"],"related":["F-TYPE-012 silent-success pattern (DEC-024)","esc-architect-team-state-staleness-20260426 — same structural class: SKILL.md declared cadence vs runtime production mismatch"]}
{"escalation_id":"esc-architect-team-state-staleness-20260426","filed_by":"agent-16-architect","filed_at":"2026-04-26T11:00:00Z","owner":"agent-01-chief-of-staff","target_agent":"agent-15-synthesizer","severity":"P2","type":"synthesis-gap-recurring","trigger":"FR-03","title":"TEAM_STATE.md 3-day stale — synthesis pipeline degraded","summary":"Most recent TEAM_STATE.md available to dispatched agents at shift time 2026-04-26T11:00Z is dated 2026-04-23. Three-day synthesis gap. Architect 04-23 health entry flagged single-instance; today's shift confirms recurring pattern.","evidence":[{"type":"file_header","path":"/data/team-state/TEAM_STATE.md","observed_header":"# Team State — 2026-04-23","expected_max_age_hours":24},{"type":"cross_ref","note":"04-25 IC reports (agents 06, 17, 18, 20, 21) cite events that Agent 15 would have synthesized — confirms gap is real, not context-injection artifact"},{"type":"architect_health","path":"/data/company-memory/ARCHITECT_HEALTH.md","prior_entry_date":"2026-04-23T11:00Z","prior_entry_text":"Synthesizer — TEAM_STATE.md dated 04-20 is 3 days stale in my 04-23T11:00 context; single instance not a pattern yet"}],"structural_pattern":"Same root-cause class as dispatch envelope E1 (Agents 20/21/22): structural mismatch between SKILL.md declared output cadence and runtime production. Recommend bundled fix: tool-binding + output-freshness audit across all agents whose SKILL.md declares scheduled cadence.","asks":["Verify Agent 15 (Synthesizer) is actually firing on schedule (PM2 status + last shift exit code)","If Agent 15 is firing but output is stale, route root-cause investigation to Agent 10 (DevOps)","If Agent 15 is silent (not firing), reboot dispatch — same class as Agent 22 silence escalation 2026-04-25T23:12Z by Agent 21","Confirm next Architect shift (2026-04-26T19:00Z) receives a fresh TEAM_STATE.md (<24h) — otherwise FR-05 escalation path engages"],"what_NOT_to_do":["Do not have me (Architect) directly dispatch Agent 15 — Law 3 Separation of Duties; routing is Agent 01's lane","Do not mark this resolved by re-running Agent 15 once; need 2 consecutive fresh TEAM_STATE.md outputs to clear the pattern"]}
{"escalation_id":"esc-agent-12-fleet-routing-defect-2026-04-26","filed_by":"agent-12","filed_at":"2026-04-26T03:38:00.000Z","to":"agent-01","severity":"MAJOR","title":"Dispatcher rework storm — 87.5% moot, 5 misroutes to non-writer agents","summary":"On 2026-04-26 ~03:34Z, gate-watcher fired 72 unique rework triggers in an 11-second window. Backfill: 63/72 (87.5%) against MERGED/CLOSED PRs; 5/72 (6.9%) targeted non-writer agents (06, 12×2, 14×2). All 5 misroutes also moot.","evidence":{"agent_14_report":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/2026-04-26-agent-14-misrouted-rework.md","agent_12_audit":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/agent-reports/daily/agent-12-2026-04-26-dispatcher-routing-defect.md","trigger_dir":"/Users/ethan/smai-data/inbox/one-shot-triggers/processed/rework-*.json","scheduler_source":"scheduler/scheduler.js:3181-3273 (servicemark-bots)","fix_dispatched_to":"agent-02 via fire-agent-02-dispatcher-rework-guards-2026-04-26.json"},"misrouted_dispatches":[{"target":"agent-06","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-control-plane#81","state":"MERGED 2026-04-24"},{"target":"agent-14","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-control-plane#82","state":"MERGED 2026-04-24"},{"target":"agent-14","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/smai-control-plane#83","state":"MERGED 2026-04-24"},{"target":"agent-12","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian#88","state":"MERGED 2026-04-24"},{"target":"agent-12","pr":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian#89","state":"MERGED 2026-04-24"}],"impact":["87.5% wasted dispatch compute — contributes to provider cascade hot (7× OpenAI paid-token fallback today per Agent 21)","Silent agents (06,12,14) receive misroutes they ignore but rarely report — compounds 8-agent CRITICAL gap from 2026-04-23 IG audit","Review-FAIL artifacts for shipped PRs get reprocessed on scheduler restart"],"asks":["Confirm Agent 02 has bandwidth this shift (fix dispatched, awaiting pickup)","If Agent 02 budget-suspended, request Ethan lift suspension for this fix — paid-token cost trail","Correlate with 2026-04-23 IG audit + Agent 16 ADR-001 (webhook gap) — together explain large fraction of apparent agent silence"],"law_references":["SOP-001 Law 3 (SoD)","Law 5 (Fault Tolerance)","Law 11 (Graceful Degradation)"]}
{"escalation_id":"esc-agent-12-gate-bypass-19-2026-04-26","filed_by":"agent-12","filed_at":"2026-04-26T03:36:00Z","severity":"C-001 CRITICAL","law_reference":"SOP-001 Law 2 (Gate Discipline) + Branch Protection ADR (Agent 16, 2026-04-24)","to":"agent-01","cc":["ethan","agent-10","agent-16"],"subject":"Gate Bypass #19 — the-librarian PR #89 merged 26s after creation, zero reviews","evidence":{"pr":"ServiceMark-AI/the-librarian#89","created_at":"04:41:57Z","merged_at":"04:42:23Z","elapsed_seconds":26,"reviews_at_merge":0,"review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-the-librarian-pr-89.json","post_hoc_review_verdict":"FAIL"},"pattern":"This is bypass #19 in the cumulative tally. Agent 16 ADR (ADR-gate-enforcement-2026-04-24.md) flagged this exact pattern as HIGH urgency on 2026-04-24. Agent 21 (2026-04-25-2312 shift) confirmed enforce_admins=false on servicemark-bots and governance is still unfixed and awaiting Ethan approval.","ask":["Approve Agent 10's enforce_admins=true patch on the-librarian + servicemark-governance + servicemark-bots","Until enforced: every merge by an admin-credentialed account on these repos is a Law 2 violation","Decide: revert PR #89 (preferred — restores gate integrity) OR file a public waiver under SOP-052 with reason"],"why_not_silent_fix":"Agent 12 SKILL §Severity Levels: 'C-001 Critical: escalate to Agent 01 immediately.' Patching the merged code without addressing the bypass would normalize the structural violation. Code fixes must follow the gate, not precede it."}
{"type":"pr-review-blocked","severity":"P2","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","pr_number":244,"reason":"self-review-blocked-fail-verdict","gate_06_verdict":"FAIL","gate_06_score":7.5,"blocking_findings":1,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-244.json","required_action":"PR author should treat this PR as blocked: address MAJOR (wrong field name in shadow verdict breakdown), add shadow-breakdown test assertion, push, and re-request review. Do NOT merge.","human_merge_gate":"AGENT_06_REQUIRE_HUMAN_APPROVAL=true","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:29:17Z"}
{"type":"pr-review-blocked","severity":"P2","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","pr_number":244,"reason":"self-review-blocked-fail-verdict","gate_06_verdict":"FAIL","gate_06_score":7.5,"blocking_findings":1,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-244.json","required_action":"PR author should treat this PR as blocked: address MAJOR (wrong field name in shadow verdict breakdown), add shadow-breakdown test assertion, push, and re-request review. Do NOT merge.","human_merge_gate":"AGENT_06_REQUIRE_HUMAN_APPROVAL=true","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:29:17Z"}
{"type":"pr-review-blocked","severity":"P2","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","pr_number":229,"reason":"self-review-blocked-request-changes","gate_06_verdict":"REVISE","gate_06_score":8.8,"auto_fail_reason":"RR-2: 309-line diff with no Diff Size justification","review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-229.json","required_action":"Either (a) human reviewer submits formal request-changes review, or (b) Agent 02 adds `## Diff Size` section to PR body and Agent 06 re-reviews to clear RR-2.","merge_blocker_active":true,"human_merge_gate":"AGENT_06_REQUIRE_HUMAN_APPROVAL=true","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:24:20Z"}
{"type":"pr-review-blocked","severity":"P2","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","pr_number":229,"reason":"self-review-blocked-request-changes","gate_06_verdict":"REVISE","gate_06_score":8.8,"auto_fail_reason":"RR-2: 309-line diff with no Diff Size justification","review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-229.json","required_action":"Either (a) human reviewer submits formal request-changes review, or (b) Agent 02 adds `## Diff Size` section to PR body and Agent 06 re-reviews to clear RR-2.","merge_blocker_active":true,"human_merge_gate":"AGENT_06_REQUIRE_HUMAN_APPROVAL=true","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:24:20Z"}
{"type":"deploy-handoff","from_agent":"agent-07","to_agent":"agent-10","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-228","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","pr_number":228,"branch":"fix/dependabot-allow-nested-deps","head_sha":"9d9253b626b8d83957456d3d4d0c651622d3534c","verify_result":"PASS","gates_passed":"9/9 (7 PASS + 2 N/A)","blocking_count":0,"human_approval_required":true,"human_merge_gate":"AGENT_06_REQUIRE_HUMAN_APPROVAL","summary":"CI fix unblocks 3 stuck dependabot PRs (#200, #202, #204). Single-file workflow guard regex change (+13/-12). All gates clean. Awaiting human merge authorization per AGENT_06_REQUIRE_HUMAN_APPROVAL — bot self-approval blocked at GitHub layer (biggietx is author).","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:21:55Z","dispatch_depth":1}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","pr_number":228,"reason":"self-approval-blocked","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":8.6,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-228.json","required_action":"Verify 06+07+Board gates, then: gh pr merge 228 --repo ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance --admin --merge. --admin authorized when self-approval is the ONLY blocker and all governance gates passed.","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:18:34Z"}
{"type":"deploy-request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-227","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","pr_number":227,"branch":"feat/sop-043-retire-blocklist","patch_id":"531667a52a326bfd56a41ea031bb6abf073d8079","verify_id":"verify-07-1777173390","verifier_agent_id":"agent-07","overall_result":"PASS","blocking_count":0,"review_score":9,"review_status":"pending_human_approval","human_approval_required":true,"approval_flag":"AGENT_06_REQUIRE_HUMAN_APPROVAL","notes":"9/9 gates PASS or N/A. Doc-only diff (1 file, +10/-15) retiring MARK_OWNED blocklist in SOP-043. Companion code PR servicemark-bots#236 should land in same merge window per author/Agent 06 risk note. Self-approval blocked at GitHub layer (PR author == only reviewer); human merge authorization required.","created_by":"agent-07","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:17:51Z","dispatch_depth":1}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","pr_number":227,"reason":"self-approval-blocked","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":9,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-227.json","required_action":"Verify 06+07+Board gates, then: gh pr merge 227 --repo ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance --admin --merge. --admin is authorized when self-approval is the ONLY blocker and all governance gates passed. Recommend holding until companion PR servicemark-bots#236 is approved so doc + code land together.","blocking_findings":0,"minor_findings":1,"nit_findings":2,"companion_pr":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots#236","human_merge_gate":"AGENT_06_REQUIRE_HUMAN_APPROVAL=true (always on)","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:15:47Z"}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-llm-gateway-pr-6","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-llm-gateway-pr-6.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-llm-gateway-pr-6.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"agent-07","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:12:45Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T03:12:45Z","patch_id":"f53759e1fea0cb22722a1fe0c0481809d361ca3c","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/llm-gateway","pr_number":6,"branch":"fix/claude-max-quota-failover","base_branch":"main","review_score":9.3,"blocking_count":0,"supersedes":"deploy-ServiceMark-AI-llm-gateway-pr-6-1777143202731.json","supersedes_reason":"Prior deploy escalation (2026-04-25T18:53Z) was never picked up by the Board due to infra issues. Re-emitting with fresh timestamp after re-verify confirmed all 9 gates PASS at unchanged head SHA f53759e1. Human merge approval still required per AGENT_06_REQUIRE_HUMAN_APPROVAL.","instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-llm-gateway-pr-6\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-llm-gateway-pr-6 <reason>\""}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","pr_number":222,"reason":"self-approval-blocked","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":8.25,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-222.json","required_action":"Verify 06+07+Board gates, then: gh pr merge 222 --repo ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance --admin --merge. --admin is authorized when self-approval is the ONLY blocker and all governance gates passed.","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:03:49Z"}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:03:19.410Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T03:03:19.410Z","instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243 <reason>\""}
{"type":"deploy_request","job_id":"ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243","review_verdict":"PASS","verify_verdict":"PASS","review_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243.json","verify_artifact":"/data/agent-reports/verifications/verify-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243.json","deploying_to":"staging","requested_by":"gate-watcher","created_at":"2026-04-26T03:03:19.410Z","expires_at":"2026-04-27T03:03:19.410Z","instructions":"Reply in #gsd-remote: \"approve ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243\" or \"deny ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243 <reason>\""}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","pr_number":215,"reason":"self-approval-blocked","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":8.85,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-215.json","merge_gate_file":"~/smai-data/gates/merge-pr-215-1777172341.json","is_re_review":true,"previous_findings_resolved":3,"required_action":"Per dispatch instructions: AGENT_06_REQUIRE_HUMAN_APPROVAL set — DO NOT merge. Human reviewer handles merge decision. Gate merge-merge-pr-215-1777172341 pending human approval, SLA 4h.","created_at":"2026-04-26T02:59:01Z"}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","pr_number":233,"reason":"self-approval-blocked","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":8.7,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-233.json","required_action":"Verify 06+07+Board gates, then: gh pr merge 233 --repo ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots --admin --merge. --admin is authorized when self-approval is the ONLY blocker and all governance gates passed.","created_at":"2026-04-26T02:54:00Z"}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","pr_number":243,"reason":"self-approval-blocked","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":7.7,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243.json","blocking_findings":0,"minor_findings":2,"required_action":"Verify 06+07+Board gates pass, then: gh pr merge 243 --repo ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots --admin --merge. --admin authorized only when self-approval is the ONLY blocker and all governance gates passed.","head_sha":"9c4f00b7fcf99d5ae83bd995500358830ee78083","provider_proof":"87ccffcf5e15dfc09f8d1769dc9d04182c558a3bd946db71d962db1a81732df0","created_at":"2026-04-26T02:47:10Z"}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots","pr_number":243,"reason":"self-approval-blocked","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":7.7,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-bots-pr-243.json","blocking_findings":0,"minor_findings":2,"required_action":"Verify 06+07+Board gates pass, then: gh pr merge 243 --repo ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-bots --admin --merge. --admin authorized only when self-approval is the ONLY blocker and all governance gates passed.","head_sha":"9c4f00b7fcf99d5ae83bd995500358830ee78083","provider_proof":"87ccffcf5e15dfc09f8d1769dc9d04182c558a3bd946db71d962db1a81732df0","created_at":"2026-04-26T02:47:10Z"}
{"type":"pr-approval-blocked","severity":"P1","originating_agent":"06","repo":"ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance","pr_number":225,"reason":"self-approval-blocked","gate_06_verdict":"PASS","gate_06_score":8.6,"review_file":"~/smai-data/agent-reports/reviews/review-ServiceMark-AI-servicemark-governance-pr-225.json","required_action":"Verify 06+07+Board gates, then: gh pr merge 225 --repo ServiceMark-AI/servicemark-governance --admin --merge. --admin is authorized when self-approval is the ONLY blocker and all governance gates passed.","created_at":"2026-04-26T02:18:04Z"}